Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 12:40:22am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
International Trade
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Stormy Seas: Trade Effects of Disruptions in the Container Ship Network 1: Leibniz University Hannover, Germany; 2: Kiel Institute Fellow International trade relies strongly on the reliable functioning of the maritime shipping network. This paper uncovers how much of global port-level trading is disrupted due to severe tropical cyclones and whether trade shifts to neighboring routes. Exploiting an event-study approach nested within a gravity framework, we find that a cyclone reduces trade flows by -8.0\% between affected port pairs, while this effect even extends to country pair trade, although with smaller magnitude. We find no according shift to neighboring routes. Instead, shipping firms charge higher freight prices on affected routes that might amplify the trading impact. Evidence from geo-located container ship voyages shows that ships facing a cyclone ahead on their journey travel at slower speed, longer effective distances and thus incur time delays. Quantifying Climate Damages When Regions Trade: A Structural Gravity Approach 1: Ecole Polytechnique, France; 2: Paris School of Economics; 3: Georgetown McCourt This paper presents a method for estimating treatment effects of local climate shocks when regions trade with each other. Because of spillovers induced by trade flows, comparing the evolution of outcomes between pre-shock and post-shock periods in regions exposed versus unexposed to local shocks leads to a biased estimate of treatment effect. We model these across-region dependencies using standard assumptions from international trade theory. We use our model-consistent estimation strategy to revisit the literature on the evaluation of im- pacts from climate change onto country-sector gross output using year-to-year variation in temperature and counterfactual scenarios where the observed warming from 1991 to 2019 would not have occurred or considering future warming predictions. Industry energy support and its interaction with EU ETS 1: Tilburg University and Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Netherlands, The; 2: Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy, Den Haag, Netherlands; 3: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Den Haag, Netherlands In this paper we study recent proposals to reduce the energy cost of the industry in the European Union as part of an industrial policy that should lift competitiveness of this sector worldwide. Using an applied general equilibrium model explicitly suited to study overlapping instruments in the context of European EU ETS we compare three support programs by a coalition of three EU countries with a large energy-intensive industrial sector, in particular France, Germany and the Netherlands. Subsidies boost competitiveness in the short run though with an increase in European emissions as long as the active Market Stability Reserve dampens the waterbed effect within the EU ETS. Interestingly, in some cases, support policies may lead to lower global emissions, since the subsidized industrial sectors within the coalition are relatively clean. Unveiling the Green Trail: FDI, Global Value Chains, and Firm Pollution in China 1: Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany; 2: Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, and University of Dundee We study how foreign ownership and firms’ positions in global value chains jointly shape pollution abatement in Chinese manufacturing. Using linked firm-level data on production, trade, and water pollution for 2003–2013, we analyze abatement of chemical oxygen demand and ammonia-nitrogen emissions. Foreign-owned firms abate more pollution than domestic firms on average, but this advantage declines with upstreamness and disappears in upstream production stages. We show that the foreign-ownership productivity premium follows a similar pattern, helping explain the weaker abatement performance upstream. The results reveal an upstreamness bias in the environmental benefits of foreign ownership. | ||

