Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 12:41:30am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
Renewable Energy Policy and Economic Effects
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Labor Market Impacts of the Green Transition: Evidence from a Contraction in the Oil Industry 1: Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research, Norway; 2: Oslo Metropolitan University; 3: ETH Zürich; 4: Stanford Graduate School of Business; 5: University of Glasgow The transition to a low-carbon economy requires a contraction of fossil fuel sectors, raising questions about the labor market costs of reallocation. We study the 2014 oil price shock as a quasi-experiment to examine the contraction of Norway’s oil and gas extraction industry. Using matched employer–employee data, we estimate long-run effects on earnings and employment using two complementary approaches. A difference-in-differences design shows moderate losses for all oil workers, while an event study reveals substantially larger and more persistent losses among displaced workers: up to 10% in earnings and 5% in employment nine years after displacement, especially for those with lower educational attainment. Although few displaced workers transition into green jobs, they are equally likely to enter green and brown (non-oil) sectors when accounting for the size of each destination sector. Earnings losses are larger for those entering green jobs rather than brown (non-oil) jobs, but smaller than for those entering other sectors. Decomposition results indicate that differences in establishment wage premiums, rather than skill mismatch, explain most of the observed gaps. Finally, geographic heterogeneity analysis shows that local labor market structure shapes recovery: proximity to green sectors and larger labor markets mitigate displacement costs, while residing in an oil-dependent region does not predict worse outcomes conditional on displacement. Renewable for Development: The Role of Small Hydropower in Rural Transformation 1: Peking University, China; 2: Zhejiang University, China; 3: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, China; 4: International Center on Small Hydro Power, China Rural electrification is vital to development, yet evidence from grid expansion remains mixed. Exploiting the staggered rollout of China’s Rural Primary Electrification Program and a DID-IV strategy, this paper examines the development impacts of small hydropower, a decentralized renewable technology providing both electricity and irrigation. SHP promotes agricultural output primarily through irrigation-driven extensive-margin increases in sown area, labor, and capital use, with limited effects on yields, and these effects are concentrated in rice-growing regions. SHP also improves electricity reliability and facilitates the adoption of energy-intensive appliances, especially among higher-income households. These findings highlight SHP’s dual role in driving rural development. The Effects of Marginal Clean Electricity Subsidies on Electricity Capacity and Emissions Yale University, United States of America In 2023, the US introduced a marginal subsidy for utility-scale clean electricity called the Energy Community Bonus, affecting about half of US counties. I use this spatial variation in subsidy levels to estimate how subsidies affect new clean electricity capacity. Over the past three years, the Energy Community Bonus increased clean electricity capacity additions in subsidized areas by about 72 percent. In the longer run, based on outcomes for proposed clean electricity projects, the policy more than doubles capacity additions. I calculate a marginal value of public funds of about 9 for solar and wind subsidies, and about 3 for battery subsidies. Finally, I ask how the cost-effectiveness of emissions abatement for the Energy Community Bonus compares to a revenue-neutral, spatially constant subsidy. This place-based subsidy yields more cost-effective carbon abatement in the case of wind and solar subsidies, with a global welfare gain of about $1.5 billion per year of long-run subsidy effect. However, the place-based subsidy is less cost-effective for battery storage, with a welfare loss of about $1.6 billion per year. The Political Marginal Value of Public Funds: Evidence from Cross-Border Electricity Infrastructure 1: University of Southern California,NOVA School of Business and Economics; 2: University Of Manchester; 3: University of Aberdeen Cross-border infrastructure projects often promise large welfare gains yet fail because they require consent from multiple jurisdictions with misaligned fiscal incentives. We develop a welfare framework for evaluating such projects when political participation constraints bind. We introduce the Political Marginal Value of Public Funds (PMVPF), a criterion that measures policy value net of the compensation required to secure universal consent. In a theoretical network model with decentralized budgets, projects with the largest aggregate efficiency gains can impose the largest concentrated losses, leading to sharp ranking reversals once political feasibility is taken seriously. We apply this framework to European electricity interconnectors using a sufficient-statistics approach with high-frequency data on prices, flows, and transmission outages. We show that while standard efficiency metrics imply welfare gains that are dozens of times larger than the fiscal cost of investment, political compensation absorbs roughly 80–90 percent of aggregate gains, clustering the PMVPF near one. Preliminary simulations indicate that political implementation costs can exceed engineering costs by an order of magnitude, providing a quantitative explanation for persistent underinvestment in cross-border transmission infrastructure. | ||

