Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 16th June 2026, 05:43:48pm WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
Food and Agriculture 1
| ||
| Presentations | ||
Does Informal Small-Scale Gold Mining Affect Cocoa Production? A Spatial Analysis in Ghana Joint Research Centre European Commission, Spain Over the past two decades, the expansion of artisanal gold mining, driven by a dramatic rise in global gold prices, has had significant socio-economic and environmental consequences in gold-rich regions. In Ghana, where gold rich regions overlap with cocoa-producing areas, tensions have emerged between informal and often illegal gold miners and local cocoa-producing communities over land use and the externalities associated with mining. We hypothesize that the proximity to and intensity of informal gold mining negatively affects cocoa productivity and profitability. Competition over resources such as land and labour as well as environmental degradation associated with mining may undermine agricultural productivity. To test this hypothesis, we combine two unique datasets, namely representative primary household data from cocoa producers and geo-spatial information on informal mining activities in cocoa-growing regions, to explore the relationship of artisanal mining and cocoa producers’ agricultural production outcomes in Ghana. Given the spatial dependence of our data, we apply a spatial econometric model, which reveals a negative association between mining proximity and intensity and cocoa yield, cocoa revenue and cocoa profit. By assessing potential impact pathways, we find that labour dynamics may explain part of these production outcomes near mine sites, where mining jobs with higher wages attract workers away from agriculture. Healthier Herds, Heavier Workloads? The Gendered Time and Resource Implications of Herd Health Management in Kenyan Dairy Systems 1Environment for Development Initiative (EfD), Kenya; 2Centre for Development Research, University of Bonn Germany; 3International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi Kenya Herd health management is an important strategy in the sustainable intensification of livestock for food system transformation. While adoption patterns and productivity gains have been analyzed in previous studies, the social implications are still not well understood. We test the hypotheses that the adoption of herd health management practices increases intra-household labor demand among male and female household members and, thereby, affects women's empowerment. We use primary data from smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya on time use, women's participation in decision-making and livestock asset ownership, adoption status of important herd health management practices, as well as household demographic characteristics. We apply censored regression and multinomial logit regression models to test our hypotheses. The results show that adopting herd health management practices is associated with more labor demand in dairy production for both men and women. The magnitude of the change differs across production systems but is always higher for men. Additionally, herd health management practices are negatively associated with different aspects of women’s empowerment including women’s livestock asset ownership and control over income from dairy. The study underscores the importance for gender-sensitivity in the sustainable intensification of livestock production in the Global South. More than money: Institutional trust and social incentives to sustain organic farming 1BETA, University of Strasbourg, France; 2INRAE, BETA; 3Economix, University of Paris Nanterre; 4CNRS, BETA This study investigates the challenges and incentives shaping the maintenance of organic farming (OF), with a particular focus on non-monetary drivers. Drawing on original survey data collected from approximately 4,000 organic farmers in France, the analysis examines the factors influencing farmers’ decisions to remain engaged in organic practices beyond the initial conversion phase. While OF is widely recognised for its environmental, social, and health benefits, its persistence is increasingly challenged by economic, technical, and social constraints. Moving beyond traditional institutional and financial support mechanisms, the study explores the role of alternative, non-monetary incentives in sustaining farmers’ commitment to OF. The results highlight the central role of institutional trust, participation in agricultural networks, and farmers’ own organic consumption patterns in explaining continued engagement in organic farming. In contrast, spatial factors—such as geographical isolation or location within environmentally sensitive or protected areas—as well as environmental sensitivity related to soil quality or climate change, do not exert a significant influence on farmers’ decisions to maintain OF. By emphasising the importance of institutional and social dimensions, this study contributes to the literature on sustainable agriculture by demonstrating that the durability of organic farming cannot be explained solely by economic incentives. The findings suggest that policies aimed at strengthening institutional trust through transparent and stable governance, and at fostering robust farmer networks, may play a crucial role in supporting the long-term viability of organic farming in France and beyond. Between-group interactions may delay a social tipping point in sustainable diets University of Warsaw, Poland We propose a data-driven synthetic network to identify target groups for policy interventions to reduce food-related emissions. In the model, diets change gradually as agents adjust the shares of their protein intake to imitate others. Connections between households reflect their similarity of cultural tastes. Policy interventions differ with respect to the number of people within each target group who receive messages about the Lancet diet. We examine both direct emission reductions from selected households changing their diets and indirect emission reductions resulting from their influence on others in the network. We find that policy messages romoting the Lancet diet to households in target groups differentiated based on lifestyle achieve greater reductions in diet-related emissions than policies targeting households in different strata of urban density or meat consumption. This is due to the tradeoff between agents’ meat consumption and social connectivity, which determines whom to target to maximize the adoption of sustainable diets. We also show that the effectiveness of policy interventions depends on whether individuals discuss diets between different target groups. Between-groups interactions may delay the diffusion of sustainable diets if the policy targets an insufficient number of individuals, that is, below a group-specific threshold. | ||

