Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:50:39am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Egg-Timer: Environmental Valuation and Choice Experiments Location: D-110 Session Chair: Lina Sommer, AgroParisTech | |
| Presentation 6 | |
Improving conservation auction performance with a rebate mechanism: A laboratory experimental investigation 1: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States of America; 2: University of Glasgow, United Kingdom This paper introduces and then evaluates a new design of a conservation auction – a rebate auction. This modification aims to incorporate auction context within the decision setting making the environment more realistic and, in the process, examine the extent to which this new feature influences (possibly lowers) rent seeking tendencies. To encourage bidders to bid closer to their true opportunity costs, all unspent funds from the auction budget are returned to all bidders – successful or not – at the end of a discriminating-price auction, with each player receiving the same rebated amount. Higher rebate payments are available, the lower the bids submitted and selected in the auction. Moreover, we pre-multiply left over funds by an investment factor, which increases the incentive for all players to moderate their rent seeking tendencies. We also test whether a priming exercise which rewards collective behavior has an impact on the performance of this Rebate Auction mechanism. Results show that (i) the rebate auction delivers an improvement in environmental performance and in the number of winning bids compared to a no-rebate format (ii) and that priming with group identity seems to worsen auction performance on a number of criteria. | |

