JavaScript is Disabled
Your browser's JavaScript functionality is disabled. It has to be enabled to use this function of ConfTool.
Here you can find information on how to enable JavaScript
If you have any problems, please contact the organizers at programme@wcere2026.org.

Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:48:41am WEST

External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.

Daily Overview

Session

Preferences
Location: B002
Session Chair: Yang Wang, Shiga University

Presentation 2

Prices or bans? Understanding public preferences over policy options

Mark A. Andor^1,2, Jana Eßer¹, Andreas Lange³, Leonie Matejko¹, Lukas Tomberg¹, Michael K. Price^4,5

1: RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, Germany; 2: Ruhr University Bochum; 3: University of Hamburg; 4: University of Alabma; 5: Australian National University

Discussant: David McEvoy (Appalachian State University)

When a policy goal is set or mandated, e.g., by a higher level of governance, policymakers have a range of instruments to choose from to reach this goal, such as pricing instruments or bans. However, implementation of such policies may fail when they lack public support. We thus study the determinants of public preferences for these instruments in two contexts using a survey experiment with more than 4,000 participants from the general German population. Respondents choose between pricing instruments and bans aimed towards the goals of reducing car traffic in city centers and sugar consumption, while we vary the price of the pricing instrument via the newly introduced Policy Price List. In addition, we vary the stringency of the ban, and information about policy effectiveness. We find that preferences over the presented policy options are sensitive to policy design for a large majority of respondents. Higher prices can both increase and decrease support for pricing, while more stringent bans are not necessarily less popular. In addition, perceived policy effectiveness matters: providing information about effectiveness increases support for the pricing instrument. By contrast, moral convictions and trait reactance primarily predict support for the policy goal itself rather than relative policy preferences.