Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:49:52am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Dynamics and Welfare Location: B133 Session Chair: Simon Lang, ETH Zurich | |
| Presentation 1 | |
Who Owns the Green Transition? Unequal Access to Finance in a Dynamic Framework 1: Centre international de recherche sur l'environnement et le développement CIRED, France; 2: Agence française de développement Achieving global climate and biodiversity goals requires unprecedented levels of green investment, yet the financing conditions facing public and private actors remain deeply unequal. This paper develops a heuristic, dynamic framework to explain how financing conditions for green assets and actions emerge, evolve, and interact with macroeconomic structures. Combining insights from ecological macroeconomics, neo-Schumpeterian theory, and balance-sheet approaches, we conceptualise the green finance gap not as a static shortfall, but as a dynamic misalignment between needed actions, the agents capable of implementing them, and the funding sources they can effectively access. We demonstrate how heterogeneous costs, risks, expected returns, and context-specific constraints shape a path-dependent selection of green investments, thereby influencing their distributive and economic effects. Our approach clarifies how different green-finance mechanisms — including cost-reducing instruments, resource-enabling tools, and risk-mitigation schemes — can reshape the investment environment and alter agents’ financing conditions to reach ecological targets. These insights provide a foundation for more context-specific policy design and call for future empirical work linking project-level dynamics, institutional arrangements, and macro-financial vulnerabilities across diverse national settings. | |

