Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:50:20am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Egg-Timer: Natural Resource Management Location: D-111 Session Chair: Luigi Reatti, Università di Firenze | |
| Presentation 2 | |
Optimal strategies for utilizing host plant distributions to slow the spread of plant pests 1: Institute of Environmental Sciences, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; 2: Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague; 3: USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station, Morgantown, WV Invasive species are spreading globally, threatening ecosystems, biodiversity, agriculture, and human health. When efforts to prevent the establishment of invasive species fail, and eradication is not possible, containment becomes necessary to slow or stop the spread of established invaders. A major question is, therefore, how to allocate treatment across space and time to contain the population cost effectively. Here, we examine how to optimize the strategies for slowing the spread of the spongy moth (Lymantria dispar) in North America by utilizing gaps with lower densities of host plants. Around these gaps, managers can apply both bio-pesticides and mating disruption methods using synthetic pheromones to disrupt male mate finding. We develop a spatially explicit model of the moth’s population dynamics, and we develop a novel algorithm that finds the spatial distribution of the two methods that optimize the cost-efficiency over landscapes with non-homogeneous distributions of host plants. Our results show that combining pesticide application and mating disruption around host-plant gaps significantly improves cost efficiency: Optimal treatment prescribes mating disruption in low-density regions nearer the moth-free area and pesticides in higher-density regions nearer the invasion front, almost without combining both methods in the same area. Suboptimal strategies that do not optimize the use of host-plant gaps can result in costs higher by tens to hundreds of percent, emphasizing the critical importance of strategic spatial planning for invasive species containment. | |

