Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:52:52am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Alternative Transport Fuels: Adoption of Electric Vehicles Location: B133 Session Chair: Jihoon Choi, George Mason University | |
    | |
Pricing and Market Dynamics of Public Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure 1: University of Tennessee, Knoxville; 2: Resources for the Future, United States of America We estimate how electric vehicle (EV) drivers value public charging across station types and contexts. Using more than 84,000 charging session transactions from 189 charging stations in the Southeastern United States between 2018 and 2024, we estimate that drivers are willing to pay about $0.57 more per kilowatt-hour for DC Fast charging relative to Level 2 charging, which implies a central value of reduced charging time of $4.23 per hour. Willingness to pay is 28% higher for long-distance drivers than for local users, reflecting the greater importance of charging speed on longer trips. We apply our estimates to compare monetary and time costs of refueling gasoline vehicles versus charging EVs at public stations. Although the average monetary cost of charging an EV at a Level 2 station is lower than refueling a gasoline vehicle, the time cost is much higher, making refueling an EV at a Level 2 charging overall more expensive. The monetary plus time cost of refueling an EV at DC Fast station is also higher relative to refueling a gasoline vehicle mostly due to the higher monetary cost. Our results have implications for the design of policies to promote EV adoption, especially among households that do not have the potential for home-based charging. | |