Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:50:45am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Thematic Session: Sensing air quality: information, experience, and implications for workplace productivity (Streaming) Location: B134 Session Chair: Ludovica Gazze, University of Warwick | |
| Presentation 3 | |
Residential Air Purifiers and the Valuation of Cleaner Air 1: IGC; 2: UC San Diego; 3: Tufts; 4: NUS Despite some of the world's worst air quality, fewer than 1\% of middle-class households in Dhaka, Bangladesh own air purifiers. We investigate this puzzle through two field experiments. First, we document that households significantly underestimate indoor pollution levels and purifier effectiveness. Although households that receive monitors or demonstrations update their beliefs, neither information provision nor interest-free loans increase willingness to pay. Second, we remove adoption barriers entirely by providing purifiers for free and compensating households for the electricity cost, yet households use them for only 30 minutes a day, resulting in no measurable health benefits. We show that accounting for this low usage substantially changes the results of standard methods for measuring the value of clean air from purchase decisions or WTP elicitation of defensive technologies, which typically assume full utilization. Instead we estimate the Marginal Willingness to Pay (MWTP) directly from objective, high-frequency usage choices and randomized variation in operating costs and find that MWTP for cleaner air is far smaller than previous estimates and tightly bound around zero. These findings suggest that low adoption of defensive technologies in highly polluted environments reflects low private valuation of the environmental amenity itself. | |

