Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:52:37am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Climate Change Mitigation 1: Taxation Location: B011 Session Chair: Gerhard Toews, NES and UiS | |
| Presentation 3 | |
Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy across Workers: A General-Equilibrium Analysis 1: Resources for the Future; 2: University of Maryland; 3: National Bureau of Economic Research Effects on jobs carry great weight in political debates, especially for environmental policy. Previous research on the impact of environmental policy on jobs, such as Hafstead and Williams (2018) and Hafstead, Williams, and Chen (2018), finds that environmental policy reallocates workers across industries with little to no net job loss. But while those papers looked at changes in the number of jobs in different industries, they didn’t directly address the distribution of transitional labor market dynamics across workers. This paper extends those papers by classifying workers by their industry at the time of policy implementation (“initial industry”) and analyzing how the change in unemployment rates varies by initial industry over time. When we track workers by their industry at time of policy implementation, we find significant differences in short-run labor-market effects (as measured by changes in unemployment rates, earnings, and unemployment durations) across a range of policies aimed at reducing energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. Unsurprisingly, we find that large negative impacts are concentrated among workers initially employed in a few carbon-intensive industries. Finally, we show that policy pre-announcement and policy phase-ins can meaningfully reduce the short-run negative employment impacts both at the aggregate level and for the most affected groups of workers. | |

