Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:52:41am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Behavioral Responses to Environmental Shocks and Externalities: Experimental Evidence Location: B129 Session Chair: Gebretsadik Teshager Siltanu, University of Copenhagen | |
| Presentation 4 | |
The role of mutual insurance networks on smallholder farmers' cooperation under drought uncertainty: Empirical evidence from a dynamic irrigation game 1: University of Copenhagen, Denmark; 2: Bahir Dar University, Ethiopia In the face of climate change induced droughts, flooding, and erratic rainfall, policymakers in low-income countries increasingly focus on integrated watershed management as a climate-smart strategy. This, however, requires collective action by smallholder farmers. In this study, we examined the effect of ex-ante mutual insurance network on collective action and farmers’ investment in watershed management under erratic drought scenarios. We conducted a lab-in-the-field experiment with 490 randomly selected smallholder farmers in Ethiopia using a dynamic irrigation game. Farmers were assigned to one of four experimental arms: (i) drought risk, (ii) mutual insurance, (iii) mutual insurance + drought risk, and (iv) base treatment. The results show that drought risk alone, as well as when combined with mutual insurance, negatively affects farmers’ investment and water extraction. Mutual insurance alone has no effect on investment. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the effect of mutual insurance on investment in watershed management depends on farmers' positions (upstream or downstream) and the degree of social preferences (reciprocity). Furthermore, while drought decreases investment under no or moderate drought risks, it increases investment when it is severe or extreme. Given the expected increase in extreme weather events, these results reveal insights into strategies to enhance farmers’ collective action for integrated watershed management as a pathway to climate change adaptation. | |

