Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:51:10am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Experimental Studies of Green Preferences Location: B133 Session Chair: Matteo Zuch, Technical University of Denmark | |
| Presentation 4 | |
The Interplay between Spatial Factors and Scope Sensitivity in Willingness to Pay for Low-Carbon Energy Technologies 1: Technical University of Denmark, Denmark; 2: Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU), Norway Scope sensitivity is a key validity criterion of stated preference (SP) studies. However, little is known about its underlying determinants, especially in the context of low-carbon energy technologies (LCET). In particular, the role of spatial characteristics in shaping willingness to pay (WTP) sensitivity to scope remains largely unexplored. This is the first valuation study to investigate how spatial factors interact with external scope effects on WTP for emerging LCETs, i.e., Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). The study proposes a new behavioral model, conceptualizing the interplay between spatial factors and technology-scope in preference formation. The framework is empirically tested using Danish representative survey data on WTP for CCS with varying CO2 reduction potentials. The SP data is combined with high-resolution spatial information on respondents’ proximity to energy infrastructure and environmental features. We find significant interaction effects between CCS scope and spatial variables. Increased local forest coverage is associated with higher WTP for larger-scope CCS, whereas solar farm exposure significantly reduces WTP for CCS with smaller emissions reduction potential. The observed patterns indicate that spatial responsiveness is a function of technology-scope, leading to variations in spatial-dependent WTP scope elasticities. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for spatial-scope interactions in SP research. | |

