Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:47:53am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Egg-Timer: Water and Agriculture Location: D-106 Session Chair: Luoye Chen, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) | |
| Presentation 6 | |
Market-Driven Adaptation to Climate Change Creates a Costly Spatial Mismatch in US Agriculture 1: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou); 2: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Climate change threatens agricultural land use, but the capacity of market prices to buffer these impacts remains fundamentally unknown. While higher prices can incentivize farmers to maintain cultivation, this adaptation may be inefficient if it occurs in different locations than where climate stress is most severe. Here, we develop an integrated econometric framework that leverages three satellite land-cover products (CDL, MODIS, Annual NLCD) to quantify the causal effects of climate and price on US cropland change from 2008-2020. Our methodological approach, which accounts for classification uncertainty, reveals that price-induced expansion occurs primarily on marginal lands at the extensive margin of cultivation. We find a significant spatial misalignment: price incentives drive expansion in regions like the Great Plains, while climate-induced losses are concentrated in core agricultural zones like the Southeast. Projecting forward, we identify a large Adaptation Gap, with the price premiums required to offset climate damages (17.9-47.3%) far exceeding projected market price increases under moderate to severe warming scenarios. Our results suggest that relying on market forces alone is an inefficient and potentially perverse strategy for ensuring agricultural resilience, highlighting the need for spatially targeted adaptation policies. | |

