Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:49:26am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Experimental Studies of Green Preferences Location: B133 Session Chair: Matteo Zuch, Technical University of Denmark | |
| Presentation 1 | |
Collective Evidence on Behavioral Interventions Targeting Carbon Pricing Support: A Many-Designs Approach with 55 Studies 1: University of Innsbruck, Austria; 2: Various Institutions worldwide Global society needs to reduce carbon emissions quickly to limit the damages caused by climate change. Most economists agree that a carbon price is an effective and cost-efficient policy to mitigate emissions, yet low public acceptance and limited political support remain major barriers to its widespread implementation. This crowd-sourced many-designs project reports results from 55 behavioral interventions on real-world support for carbon pricing, independently developed by international research teams randomly selected from an initial pool of 135 applications. By implementing all interventions simultaneously with almost 20,000 U.S. residents, this pre-registered study ensures comparability of results, accelerates scientific knowledge generation, and reduces risks of scientific malpractices such as p-hacking, selective reporting, and HARKing. Results show very small (Cohen’s d from 0.04 to 0.07) and statistically significant positive effects of behavioral interventions on real-world support, stated support, and willingness to endorse a carbon price that internalizes social costs of $120 per ton of CO2 emissions. This entails an increase in support for carbon pricing across measures of around two percentage points. We find low between-study heterogeneity (τ from 0.07 to 0.12), indicating that behavioral interventions in this domain are similarly effective. Lastly, we identify strong overconfidence among research teams regarding the expected effects of their interventions and those of others, highlighting the need to recalibrate expectations. | |

