Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:53:40am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Climate Finance and Clean-Tech Investment Location: B128 Session Chair: Jan-Niklas Meier, Leipzig University | |
| Presentation 3 | |
Harmonize to Mobilize: Climate Policy Alignment and Cross-Border Clean-Tech Investment 1: University of Oxford, United Kingdom; 2: Santa Fe Institute, United States Global climate finance has expanded rapidly, yet cross-border clean-technology investment remains limited and highly concentrated among advanced economies. This paper argues that scaling cross-border clean-technology investment requires not only financial de-risking strategies, but also credible coordination across national climate policies as a complementary pathway to mobilize capital at scale. Building on evidence that regulatory alignment facilitates international trade and capital flows, we conceptualize climate-policy alignment as a two-sided coordination problem in which bilateral investment depends on mutually consistent long-term decarbonization signals. Using a bilateral dataset covering over 500,000 clean-technology investment flows across 195 countries from 2017 to 2022, we examine carbon-tax alignment as an observable form of climate-policy coordination. Employing a staggered event-study design, we find that bilateral clean-tech investment increases by approximately 270% following mutual carbon-tax adoption, with no evidence of anticipatory effects. The gains from alignment are heterogeneous. Effects are larger for peripheral destinations and for country pairs without strong pre-existing ties, such as colonial relationships or a common language, suggesting that policy alignment can substitute for traditional channels of bilateral integration. Moreover, the presence of multilateral development banks (MDBs) significantly amplifies the investment response, indicating strong complementarity between policy de-risking and financial de-risking instruments. | |

