Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:53:46am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Alternative Transport Fuels: Adoption of Electric Vehicles Location: B133 Session Chair: Jihoon Choi, George Mason University | |
| Presentation 1 | |
How do consumers respond to tax changes in electric vehicles? Evidence from the Danish registration tax reform 1: Technical University of Denmark, Denmark; 2: Colorado State University, United States; 3: National University of Singapore, Singapore; 4: Renmun Unversity of China, China This paper examines how consumers respond to purchase-stage tax changes in the electric vehicle (EV) market, using the 2021 Danish registration tax reform as a quasi-natural experiment. The reform simultaneously introduced tax reductions for some EVs and tax increases for others within a single tax system, creating a unique setting to study asymmetric demand responses to price changes of opposite directions. Using model-level monthly sales data from Denmark and neighboring Nordic countries, we implement a difference-in-differences design to identify the causal effects of the reform on EV adoption. We find that the reform significantly increased overall EV sales in Denmark relative to comparable markets, with demand responses primarily concentrated among lower-priced EVs, while higher-priced models exhibit little measurable response. Further analysis reveals asymmetry: EVs experiencing tax reductions display clear sales increases, whereas EVs facing tax increases do not exhibit symmetric demand contractions. We also document substantial heterogeneity across EV segments, which is consistent with the interaction between price thresholds and battery-capacity-based deductions embedded in the tax schedule. From a policy perspective, the results suggest that differentiated EV purchase taxes can promote adoption among price-sensitive consumers while preserving fiscal sustainability. | |

