Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 24th Aug 2026, 01:50:41am WEST
External resources will be made available 30 min before a session starts. You may have to reload the page to access the resources.
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Egg-Timer: Energy Transition and Technology Adoption Location: D-110 Session Chair: Graham Macklin, Toulouse School of Economics | |
| Presentation 2 | |
The Cost of Energy Transition: Household Income Shocks and Welfare Losses Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China, People's Republic of Could energy transition policies inadvertently lead to adverse effects on households while pursuing sustainable development goals? Using data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), this paper examines the impact of an energy transition policy in China, the New Energy Demonstration City Pilot Program, on household income, paying attention to vulnerable groups particularly. The results show that the policy lead to an average decline of 6.58% in total household income and a 5.04% reduction in income for the head of household. Specifically, the policy decreased individual wage income, household property income, and household transfer income. The latter two are the main contributors to the overall decline in total household income. Mechanism analysis suggests that employment structure adjustments, rising energy costs, and inadequate compensation mechanisms are the key transmission channels. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that energy transition has a stronger negative impact on the incomes of low-income households, low-asset families, employed individuals, and those with lower levels of education. Welfare analysis further reveals that the policy has a significantly stronger inhibitory effect on developmental consumption than on subsistence consumption, resulting in long-term welfare losses for households. | |

