P2: 1
Incorporating wearable sensor data into research workflows
Gregory B Sands, Hayden Randles, Poul M F Nielsen
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, New Zealand
P2: 2
Modelling the neural regulation of gastric motility at the tissue level
Omkar N. Athavale, Recep Avci, Alys R. Clark, Leo K. Cheng, Peng Du
University of Auckland, New Zealand
P2: 3
Efficient numerical simulation of effective micro-macro models for reactive transport in elastic perforated media
Jonas Knoch1, Nicolas Neuß1, Markus Gahn2, Maria Neuss-Radu1,2
1FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany; 2Universität Heidelberg, Germany
P2: 4
The development of the phantom fiber to mimick muscle fibre activity for the validation of magnetomyography sensors
Ahmet Dogukan Keles1, Thomas Klotz1,2, Justus Marquetand3, Oliver Röhrle1,2
1Institute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; 2Stuttgart Center for Simulation Sciences (SC SimTech), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; 3MEG-Center Tübingen, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
P2: 5
A multiscale network model of tumor microenvironment to predict immunotherapeutic response of head and neck cancers
Priyan Bhattacharya1,4, Andrew South2,4, My Mahoney2,4, Adam Luginbuhl3,4, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli1,4
1Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America; 2Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America; 3Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America; 4Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
P2: 6
Mechanobiological modelling to capture relative effects of deviatoric and volumetric stresses on epiphyseal bone growth
Jorge Mateos Arriola1, Carlos Ruiz Wills1, Miguel A. González Ballester1,2, Jérôme Noailly1
1Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain; 2ICREA, Spain
P2: 7
Sensory perturbation due to blood flow restriction leads to change in active MU pool
Franziska Bubeck1,2, Mansour Taleshi3, Ivan Vujaklija3, Oliver Röhrle1,2, Leonardo Gizzi4
1Institute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; 2Stuttgart Center for Simulation Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany; 3Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; 4Department of Biomechatronic Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation, Stuttgart, Germany
P2: 8
A graphic representation of arterial pulse pressure vs. mean arterial pressure time series may be used for clinical decision support during intraoperative hypotension
Estefanía Žugelj Tapia1, Marko Žličar2, Borut Kirn1
1University of Ljubljana, Medical faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia; 2University Clinical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenija
P2: 9
Development of a hemodynamic model to simulate heart failure patients
Juliana Franz1,2, Arina Borzistaia1,2, Titus Kühne1,2, Leonid Goubergrits1,2
1Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; 2Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
P2: 10
Hypertensive signature in the photoplethysmography signal by combining a whole-body cardiovascular model and optical simulations
Clement Vasseur, Xavier Bednarek, Pierre Blandin, Matthieu Perriolat, Guillaume Blanquer
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, DTIS, Grenoble, France
P2: 11
Pre-procedural planning of transcatheter heart valve interventions using imaging and in silico modelling
Shelly Singh-Gryzbon
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
P2: 12
A 0D-1D global, closed-loop model of the cardiovascular system
Stefano Costa1, Lucas Omar Mueller1, Federica Caforio2,3,4
1Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Trento, (Italy); 2Department of Mathematics and Scientific Computing, NAWI Graz, University of Graz (Austria); 3Gottfried Schatz Research Center: Division of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz (Austria); 4BioTechMed-Graz, (Austria)
P2: 13
In silico validation of TAG-based coronary blood flow distribution methods for patient-specific computational iFR prediction
Ester Bergantin, Lucas Omar Müller
University of Trento, Italy
P2: 14
A comparative study between 3D segmentation methods of aorta in contrast enhanced MR acquisitions
Horia Andrei Leonte1,2, Alexandru Constantin Serban1,2, Lucian Mihai Itu1,2
1Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania; 2Advanta, Siemens SRL, Brasov, Romania
P2: 15
Simulation workflow for stent-assisted coiling of brain aneurysms
Felix Borges, Alexander Pugachev
Simq GmbH, Germany
P2: 16
Atmospheric pollutants and atrial arrhythmias: An in silico study
Catalina Tobon1, Laura C Palacio1, Sami F Noujaim2, Javier Saiz3
1MATBIOM, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia; 2Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States; 3Centro de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain
P2: 17
In-silico assessment of hemodynamics in stenoses of the fontan circulation
Adriano Schlief1,2, Simon Bender1,2, Peter Kramer2,3, Marie Schafstedde1,2,4, Jan Brüning1,2,4
1Institute of Computer-assisted Cardiovascular Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; 2Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Berlin, Germany; 3Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany; 4DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Berlin, Germany
P2: 18
A clinical decision support tool for patient management
Krzysztof Gądek, Adam Nowak, Rafał Niżankowski, Dominik Radziszowski, Joanna Twaróg, Maja Więckiewicz
Sano – Centre for Computational Personalised Medicine International Research Foundation, Poland
P2: 19
Creation and regression analysis of a hemodynamic virtual patient database
Richard Weber, Márta Viharos, Katalin Pálfalvi, Dániel Gyürki, György Paál
Department of Hydrodynamic Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Budapest University of Technology and Economics Műegyetem rkp. 3., H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
P2: 20
Towards a prostate cancer radiotherapy digital twin: Simulating the response of prostate cancer to external radiotherapy through mechanistic multiscale modelling. Sensitivity analysis and clinical adaptation
Eleni Kolokotroni A.1, Foteini Panagiotidou1, Stamatia Tsampa1, Christos Kyroudis1, Simon Spohn2,3,4, Anca-Ligia Grosu2,3, Dimos Baltas3,5, Ilias Sachpazidis3,5, Constantinos Zamboglou2,3,6, Georgios S. Stamatakos1
1National Technical University of Athens, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, In Silico Oncology and In Silico Medicine Group, Greece; 2University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Germany; 3German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; 4Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 5University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Germany; 6German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
P2: 21
Recommendations and requirements for implementing computational models in clinical integrated decision support systems (ISO/TS 9491-2)
Laura Lopez-Perez1, Elena Martinelli2, Marc Kirschner3, Sylvia Krobitsch3, Heike Moser4, Giuseppe Fico1, Tito Poli2, Martin Golebiewski5
1Universidad Politécnica de Madrid-Life Supporting Technologies Research Group, ETSIT, 28040 Madrid, Spain; 2Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy; 3Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Projekt Management Jülich, Jülich, Germany; 4DIN - German Institute for Standardization, Berlin, Germany; 5Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS gGmbH), Heidelberg, Germany
P2: 22
Benchmarking computational models of peritoneal dialysis in pigs and patients
Sangita Swapnasrita1,2, Joost C deVries2, Carl Oberg3, Aurelie MF Carlier1, Karin GF Gerritsen2
1Maastricht University, the Netherlands; 2UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands; 3Lund University, Sweden
P2: 23
Toward multiscale lymph node model: T cell search strategy study
Tomas Bily, Sára Štráchalová, Alžběta Prášilová
CUNI, Czech Republic
P2: 24
Software infrastructure tools for biomedical models in systems biology
Herbert Martin Sauro
University of Washington, United States of America
P2: 25
Probabilistic Boolean modelling highlights neural tube closure dynamics and molecular signalling insights
Ahmed Hemedan1, Job Berkhout2, Luiz Ladeira3, Alessio Gamba3, Harm Heusinkveld2, Liesbet Geris3,4, Bernard Staumont3, Rudi Balling5, Marek Ostaszewski1,6, Venkata Satagopam1,6, Reinhard Schneider1,6
1Luxembourg University, Luxembourg; 2Centre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; 3Biomechanics Research Unit, GIGA In Silico Medicine, University of Liège, Belgium; Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Belgium; 4Biomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Belgium; 5Institute of Molecular Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; 6ELIXIR Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg
P2: 26
Explanatory models of human physiology to teach pathophysiology of diabetic ketoacidosis with simulators
Tomas Kulhanek, Jiri Kofranek
First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic
P2: 27
In silico clinical trial to predict the efficacy of alendronate for preventing hip fractures
Sophie Nguyen1,2,3, Sara Oliviero1,4, Giacomo Savelli1,4, Antonino Amedeo La Mattina4, Marco Viceconti1,4
1Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; 2Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Liège, Belgium; 3Biomechanics Section, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Belgium; 4Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
P2: 28
Comparative assessment of lower limb joint angle estimation between BTS system and OpenSim
Mahshida Hamid1, Sanyam Phutela1, Rounak Bhattacharyya1, Manish Gupta2, Bhavuk Garg2, Rajesh Malhotra2,3, Madhusudan Pal4,5, Anoop Chawla1, Sudipto Mukherjee1, Kaushik Mukherjee1
1Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India; 2All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India; 3Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India; 4Defense Institute of Physiology & Allied Science, Defence Research & Development Organisation, Delhi, India; 5Center of Excellence, Footwear Design & Development Institute, Noida, India
P2: 29
Quantification of periprosthetic bone loss using electrical impedance tomography
Lisa Krukewitt, Sascha Spors
University of Rostock, Germany
P2: 30
Machine learning framework to study the impact of metastatic cancer in the spine
Simão Laranjeira1, Simon Walker-Samuel2, Rebecca J. Shipley1
1UCL Mechanical Engineering, London, UK; 2UCL Centre for Computational Medicine, Division of Medicine, London, UK
P2: 31
A sustainable neuromorphic framework for disease diagnosis using AI
Rutwik Gulakala, Marcus Stoffel
RWTH Aachen, Germany
P2: 32
Limits and capabilities of diffusion models for the anatomic editing of digital twins
Karim Kadry1, Shreya Gupta1, Farhad R. Nezami2, Elazer R. Edelman1,2
1MIT, United States of America; 2Brigham and Women's Hospital
P2: 33
Cross-disease predictive analysis for pandemic preparedness
Joana Elena Meyer1, Sebastian Fritsch2, Andreas Schuppert1
1Institute for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen, Germany; 2Departement of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany
|