This work aims at putting to a joint empirical test the claims of such major social theories as social constructivism and symbolic interactionism. Namely, that shared meaning is established in professional and in everyday interaction, facilitated by material objects in a common physical space.
Data include collaboration and friendship ties, ethnographic descriptions of objects (artworks, materials, tools, and everyday items) filling shared spaces, and fixed individual attributes (e.g., gender and age) for three collectives of artists across three time points.
Not all objects are meaningful to every artist. Hence, any single object usually has no values on what it means to some of the artists. Furthermore, descriptions are usually short, which results in rare overlaps in semantic associations between pairs of descriptions, hindering their direct pairwise comparisons. To address this, based on descriptions of objects provided by both artists in a dyad, we used Correlated Topic Models to evaluate total dyadic similarity in meanings in dyads of artists per group/wave.
Analysing these networks is a modelling challenge due to small size, high clustering, and the nature of similarity relations derived from text and thus systematically constrained. Our pooled MRQAP models across the three groups predict total dyadic similarity from prior similarity, collaboration and friendship ties from the previous wave, and similarity in gender and age. Preliminary results suggest that social ties—particularly collaboration—predict greater similarity of meanings over time. Additionally, social closure (shared contacts) fosters similarity, while attribute similarity also plays a role, though with less consistency.