Conference Agenda
The Online Program of events for the SEM 2026 Annual Meeting appears below. This program is subject to change. The final program will be published in early November.
Use the search bar to search by name or title of paper/session. Note that this search bar does not search by keyword.
Click on the session name for a detailed view (with participant names and abstracts).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 29th Aug 2026, 08:48:41pm EDT
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
08K: Histories of Ethnomusicology: Knowledge, Translation, and the Politics of Difference Location: State Room East | |
| Presentation 2 | |
“Doubtless the Chinese think our harmony barbarous”: Problematizing Eurocentrism through Christian Universalism in Mary Martin Richard’s A Paper on Chinese Music (1907) University of Pittsburgh By analyzing A Paper on Chinese Music (1907) by Mary Martin Richard (1843-1903), a Scottish Baptist missionary in late Qing China who uncharacteristically adapted “un-Westernized” local Chinese musics for devotional purposes, this paper presents a case study that, I argue, shows clear evidence of a sympathetic attitude and open-minded approach towards Chinese musics and their practitioners from the perspective of a Christian-European expatriate in the age of high Western imperialism and “scientific” racism. Unsurprisingly, Eurocentrically culturalist and/or racist ideas and attitudes are commonly found in late 19th and early 20th century European texts on Chinese music, such as J.A. Van Aalst's Chinese Music (1884). I show how A Paper on Chinese Music differs from similar texts in one crucial aspect: while the author does not completely dispense with the commonly held idea of “civilized vs. barbarous,” she at times reflexively relativizes and, thus, de-Eurocentricizes it. This is clearly shown in her discussion of the lack of harmony in Chinese music: after pointing out that European harmony, typically regarded as an emblem of European musical superiority then, “is said to have come from Northern barbarous hordes,” she claims, in an as-a-matter-of-fact manner, that “doubtless [the Chinese] think [our harmony] barbarous” (17). I further suggest that her problematization of Euro-supremacism and Euro-exceptionalism was ideationally grounded in a Christian-universalist worldview. Theoretically, I hope to shed some light on the complex and not always harmonious relations between Eurocentrism(s) and Universalism(s), which tend to be lumped together in discussions within contemporary Anglophone music studies. | |
