Conference Agenda
The Online Program of events for the SEM 2026 Annual Meeting appears below. This program is subject to change. The final program will be published in early November.
Use the search bar to search by name or title of paper/session. Note that this search bar does not search by keyword.
Click on the session name for a detailed view (with participant names and abstracts).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 29th Aug 2026, 08:47:02pm EDT
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
12H: Sonic Encounters: Ritual, Race, and Cultural Pluralism in Peru Location: Persimmon | |
| Presentation 2 | |
Esa Pollerita…: The social life of the pollera and the ¿subversion of racism? in the sonic political interruptions of Milena Warthon’s music. UC Riverside, The pollera has historically been a gendered, racialized clothing object in the Peruvian context. In its various situated designs, it has been associated with low-class, primarily rural, indigenous women, establishing a distinction between elite and grassroots women, and embroidering considerations of class, race/culture, and territory. Indeed, “pollera” could be understood as a “metonimic object” that names otherness derogatorily. Nevertheless, during Milena Warthon’s (MW) concerts, we can observe many girls wearing this traditional garment and singing her songs. MW is a singer who performs a genre that she calls the New Andean Pop. During her performances (in concerts, music videos, and social media), she wears polleras and sings about the struggles of the women and girls who wear them. I argue, echoing Silvia Citro’s understanding of performance, that MW’s performances are the convergence of poietic artistic objects that articulate social critiques with political goals. This happens through (sonic) political interruptions (Rancière) that invite her audience to hear an alternative discourse and therefore relate to the social life of this object in a different affective way, generating new aural affective commonalities (Ochoa-Gautier). If we consider the pollera as an object that represents an instituted hierarchy, MW’s performance uses the pollera as an instituting object. In other words, if the hierarchized pollera represents “politics,” the pollera that this artist wields expresses “the political. This ethnography aims to contribute to discussions concerning the intersections between aesthetics and politics as a means of creating alternative spaces for the political and the decolonization of feelings. | |
