Conference Program
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
🚩 [SPECIAL EVENT] H.00. Framing School-to-Work Programs: Evaluation, Voice and Social Justice
Chairs: Donatella Poliandri (INVALSI), Mauro Palumbo (University of Genoa), Alessandra Decataldo (University of Milano-Bicocca). Promoted by Associazione "Per Scuola Democratica". Further information on special events are available on the conference website: https://www.scuolademocratica-conference.net/workshops-3/. | |
| Session Abstract | |
Promoted by Associazione "Per Scuola Democratica"Chairs Donatella Poliandri (INVALSI), Mauro Palumbo (University of Genoa), Alessandra Decataldo (University of Milano-Bicocca) Keywords school-to-work programs; evaluation; voice and recognition School-to-Work Programs (SWPs) are increasingly promoted as policy responses to the challenges young people face in accessing meaningful learning and work opportunities. Yet, evaluations often focus on immediate functional outcomes, capturing only part of their significance. Their democratic and distributive implications also depend on how SWPs are framed, evaluated and governed—on the assumptions they embed, the opportunities they open to different groups of students, and the forms of recognition and participation they enable or constrain. Drawing on capability and social justice perspectives, this panel examines SWPs as policy instruments whose design can either broaden opportunities or reinforce stratification. We welcome contributions that investigate SWPs through evaluation lenses capable of making issues of justice, recognition, and voice visible. Proposals may explore: (a) how SWPs distribute learning and work opportunities across social groups; (b) how teachers, school leaders, educational and company tutors, families and host organisations negotiate responsibilities and expectations in contexts of institutional change; (c) how students interpret and articulate their SWP experiences, bringing their voice to the forefront; (d) how evaluation and monitoring tools illuminate the mechanisms linking local practices to broader regimes of inequality and precarious work. During the panel, the Special Issue Learning for Democracy, 2/2025, “School-to-Work Programs: an Opportunity for Social Justice?”, will be presented, providing a shared framework for discussing its conceptual contributions and empirical insights. This presentation will support a broader exchange on comparative and international perspectives, upcoming research, and future directions for advancing work on SWPs, democratic evaluation, and educational justice. | |
| Presentations | |
Accepted
PCTO Between Policy Frames and Local Constraints: Host Organisations, Coordination Gaps, and Stratified Opportunities Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca Within a broader European shift toward work-based learning centred on key competences and lifelong guidance, Italy’s PCTO (Percorsi per le Competenze Trasversali e per l’Orientamento - starting from the 2025/26 school year School-to-Work Training FSL) reframes school-to-work programs around transversal competences, orientation and the governance of the partnerships among school, host institution and other stakeholders. With this contribution, we aim to reconstruct how that frame is interpreted in practice and how it shapes the distribution of learning and work opportunities from the point of view of host structures. The study is part of broader national research on PCTO; we draw our evidence from 27 interviews with key informants and host tutors and a two-stage email survey targeting host tutors (2022–2023. N=356). First, we observe a gap between formal alignment with the aspirations of PCTOs and their implementation. Overall, host tutors agree on the centrality of transversal competences and orientation, yet implementation diverges systematically across host organisations. Some organisations, often public/third-sector, cultural or research-oriented, tend to conform more easily and consistently to the transversal competences frame, whereas projects hosted by businesses, especially in Italy’s SME-dominated economy, tend to remain geared toward technical training and job-specific skills. This is not simply a matter of preferences or stiffness: it reflects tensions between educational expectations and the organisational constraints of the Italian economic fabric. Case-by-case adaptations generate sharp heterogeneity in project quality and learning outcomes. The reform reduces project hours and widens a divide between host organisations that can easily align with students’ and families’ expectations and the policy’s broader goals, and less structured organisations, especially micro and small firms, whose technically oriented training becomes less effective when squeezed into shorter timeframes. The result is a two-speed PCTO system that reproduces school segregation and educational inequalities within the host structures. Second, PCTO guidelines call for integrated cooperation between schools and host organisations, as the main driver for customisation and the overall quality of the projects delivered. However, our evidence shows that fully collaborative coordination is relatively rare. Most projects are governed through fragmented or partially integrated arrangements, where responsibilities for design and monitoring are unevenly shared and interactions between tutors are intermittent. Importantly, integrated coordination is less explained by sector, territory, or organisational size per se than by internal organisational conditions, such as strong support, time and capacity to sustain the coordination work required for partnership. Finally, we highlight how contextual factors such as relational and experiential capital, (e.g accumulated organisational experience with PCTO, pre-existing networks) shape also the likelihood of post-PCTO work-related collaborations. Where internal support is scarce, organisational constraints are tight and host structures have less experience in PCTOs, partnerships tend to remain episodic and reactive; where resources, capacity and networks exist, PCTOs are successful. In this sense, the policy tends to presuppose, rather than build, the organisational and relational conditions needed, struggling to challenge pre-existing inequalities and school segregation, but rather mirroring within host structures. | |
