Conference Program
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
H.14. Lifelong Guidance Against Social Inequalities: Toward Integrated Policies Location: Aule di Botanica (CU028): Aula Blu2 Convenor(s): Eleonora Scrivo (ActionAid International Italia Ets, Italy); Annalisa Buffardi (Indire– Istituto Nazionale di Documentazione, Innovazione e Ricerca Educativa) | |
| Presentation 2 | |
Lifelong Guidance Against Inequalities: Why Italy’s Non-system Fails and What Refugee Pathways Reveal Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy Lifelong guidance is often presented as a key tool to reduce social inequalities, but in Italy it still operates within a fragmented “non-system” rather than within integrated policies. In schools, guidance is frequently occasional and deadline-driven, linked to administrative requirements more than to structured career management skills’ education. Moreover, the absence of dedicated experts and shared standards is compounded by highly inadequate indicators of effectiveness. The situation does not improve in the context of labor market policies, where guidance is commonly reduced to mere job placement. Organizational incentives and performance indicators favor quick and measurable outputs instead of quality and sustainable career outcomes. As a result, coordination between education, training, employment services, and third sector organizations remains weak. Information on training options and labor market rules is often not sufficiently “decoded” for users, and responsibility for guidance is widespread but not clearly owned: guidance tasks are delegated to staff who cover them because of role proximity, without solid methods, common tools, or specific accountability. In this context, a frequent “solution” is improvisation: prescriptive interventions focused on immediate choices and short-term jobs, where practitioners decide for the person instead of strengthening agency, self-efficacy, exploration, and responsible decision-making. | |
