Conference Program
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
B.06. Dialogic Teaching in Education: Practices, Languages, and Conditions for Democratic Learning (2/2) Location: Scienze Politiche (CU002): Sala Lauree Convenor(s): Serena Goracci (Indire, Italy); Luisa Zecca (University of Milano Bicocca, Italy); Laura Parigi (Indire, Italy); Loredana Camizzi (Indire, Italy) | |
| Presentation 6 | |
“Rise! – Voices and Bodies of Democracy”: when a Performance Becomes a Pretext for Discussion at School University of Parma, Italy This paper presents a research conducted as part of a program for the development of cross-curricular skills and career guidance (PCTO): SORGETE! – Voices and Bodies of Democracy. The project’s title refers to the dance-theater performance directed by Simona Lisi and produced by Collettivo Collegamenti, which was used as a starting point to explore issues related to gender equality. The theatrical performance, in fact, centers its reflection on the story of the ten Italian female teachers who, in 1906, temporarily obtained the right to vote, inspired by Maria Montessori’s proclamation, “All women, rise up!” The research question This exploratory research begins with an analysis of the facilitator’s interventions, asking whether and how the facilitator’s questions or interventions support discussion, the expression of divergent thinking, reflection, and conversation. Other elements that are part of democratic education will be taken into consideration, such as: active participation of individual group members (for example: do group members participate actively?); depth of arguments (are arguments used that demonstrate cognitive decentralization?), quality of alternative, novel, and non-conformist proposals, increasing progressively from the first to the fourth meeting and the evolution of cohesion within the research community. | |
