Conference Program
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
B.08. Knowledge, Data, and Democracy: Towards Systemic Innovation in School (INDIRE Location: Scienze Politiche (CU002): Sala Lauree Convenor(s): Andrea Nardi (Indire, Italy); Silvia Panzavolta (Indire, Italy); Andrea Benassi (Indire, Italy) | |
| Presentation 4 | |
Leadership in Education: Lead for Democracy GEM Report UNESCO, France This paper explores how democratic school governance and distributed leadership drive innovation within education systems and promote learning for democracy. Drawing on data from UNESCO's Global Education Monitoring Report Lead for Learning (2024) and its regional edition, Lead for Democracy: Latin America (2025), it analyses how sharing decision-making power among teachers, students, families, and communities helps build stronger educational outcomes and democratic skills. The report finds that traditional top-down models of school leadership no longer adequately address today’s complex educational challenges. Collaborative leadership styles such as distributed, participatory, or democratic approaches, empower schools to harness the collective expertise of their communities, set shared goals, encourage cooperation, and support meaningful learning. These practices are deeply rooted in Latin American educational culture, even when not formally recognized by policy. Through comparative policy analysis and case studies from various Latin American countries, the presentation will examines how governance structures, leadership training, and avenues for participation influence schools’ ability to operate as democratic institutions. The evidence indicates that distributed leadership boosts agency, involvement, and civic education, while also enhancing school improvement and organizational innovation. Yet, there are notable gaps between policy intentions and real-world practice. Centralized decision-making, insufficient preparation for collaborative leadership, and lack of recognition for teacher and student leadership all limit the impact of democratic governance in schools. Ultimately, this work contends that promoting distributed leadership will advance both democratic values and educational quality, positioning schools as spaces for democratic experimentation and systemic progress. | |
