Conference Program
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
M.13. The Implications of Smartphones and Digital Environments for Learning and Psychophysical Well-Being Location: Edificio ex Tumminelli (C007): Sala Sociologia Convenor(s): Marco Gui (Università di Milano "Bicocca"); Orazio Giancola (Università di Roma "Sapienza", Italy); Giovanni Maria Abbiati (Università degli Studi di Brescia) | |
| Presentation 5 | |
The Figuration of the Opaque: Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Production and Democratic Education in Troubled Times Institute of Political Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague This paper proposes that the incorporation of artificial intelligence into higher education constitutes a figurational transformation whose implications for democratic knowledge production remain theoretically underspecified. Drawing on Norbert Elias's figurational sociology and the concept of technological re-enchantment developed in relation to Weberian rationalisation theory (Císař Brown, 2025), the paper argues that AI integration is restructuring the interdependence figuration of the university in ways that generate a structural form of epistemic dependence incompatible with the reality-adequate knowledge production Elias associated with civilising processes and functional democratisation. The argument consists of three pillars. First, it examines how Elias's concept of reality congruence, and the graduated detachment it requires, presupposes a figuration in which the transmission and validation of knowledge remains at least in principle reconstructable by participants. Second, it analyses how AI systems, through their subsymbolic architecture and recursive optimisation logic, produce what is characterised here as a structural explanation deficit: not contingent ignorance remediable through better pedagogy, but a constitutive opacity that renders epistemic submission a rational adaptation rather than an aberration. Third, it considers what this means for the Eliasian question of functional democratisation: specifically, whether higher education can continue to produce the capacity for autonomous, self-regulating epistemic judgement on which democratic participation depends when the figuration of knowledge production is being reorganised around interfaces rather than understanding. The paper is careful to avoid technological determinism: the structural conditions described are products of specific developmental choices rather than inherent properties of AI as such. Nevertheless, it argues that these choices have produced a figuration whose civilising and de-civilising implications deserve sustained sociological attention. | |
