Conference Agenda
The Online Program of events for the 2026 AMS Annual Meeting appears below. This program is subject to change. The final program will be published in early November.
Use the "Filter by Track or Type of Session" or "Filter by Session Topic" dropdown to limit results by type. Some of the sessions are also color-coded: purple indicates performances, grey indicates paper forums, and orange indicates sessions which have been organized by one of the regional associations of IMS (ARLAC or IMSEA). (Sessions which are both IMS sessions and performances are only colored orange.)
Use the search bar to search by name or title of paper/session. Note that this search bar does not search by keyword.
Click on the session name for a detailed view (with participant names and abstracts).
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 1st Sept 2026, 02:34:27am EDT
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
Networks of Modernist Influence | |
| Presentation 3 | |
Aliutė Mečys’s Ligeti: Iconography, Irrealism, Hybrid Perception East Carolina University, Before dedicating herself to painting, Lithuanian-German artist Aliutė Mečys (1943, Koblenz – 2013, Hamburg) worked as a stage and costume designer at Schillertheater Berlin and later at the Hamburg State Opera. Between 1970 and 1982, Mečys shared a personal and professional partnership with composer György Ligeti (1923, Transylvania – 2003, Vienna). She introduced Ligeti to Michel de Ghelderode’s play La Balade du Grand Macabre (1935)––the source for his “anti-anti-opera” Le Grand Macabre––and designed costumes for its premiere and subsequent performances in Stockholm, Hamburg, and London in 1978. Beyond her theatrical career, Mečys created several paintings portraying Ligeti in ways that radically depart from traditional composer iconography. Inspired by the trauma of their separation, in the 1980s Mečys incorporated representations of Ligeti into her paintings that depict the complexity of this man, indeed his inner conflict. While these works allude to the couple’s intimacy and eventual estrangement, they embed Ligeti’s abstracted figure within a symbolic universe drawn from prehistoric, European, matriarchal culture and Lithuanian, animistic mythology—traditions Mečys increasingly explored as an independent artist. At the same time, these portrayals also illustrate the idealistic aspirations of Mečys’s art. Through these hybrid images, she envisioned a utopian world free from violence and corruption, countering the trauma that marked both artists’ early lives: Mečys’s father served under the Nazi regime; Ligeti lost close family members in concentration camps. My music-iconographical analysis situates these paintings within Mečys’s self-described style of “irrealism”—in her own words, “realistic pictures of unreal realities” (Stahnke, 2024). Mečys’s irrealistic synthesis of old and new, real and unreal, personal and mythical interrogates the ideologies of perception and reframes the visual representation of composers in late-twentieth-century art. Her illustrations intertwine themes of mythology, cultural identity, and mystical allegories. They illuminate an overlooked dialogue between music, myth, and modernism, challenging conventional narratives of artistic influence. Yet, in the case of those artworks that integrate Ligeti’s image, the Canvas speaks of a difficult relationship between the two––art filled with anxiety, fear, mental conflicts, loneliness, and images of personal degradation. | |
