Various efforts are currently being made to reduce the environmental impacts of French scientific research. One of the initial efforts is through the actions of the GDR Labos 1point5. These actions are crucial for raising awareness and/or mobilising researchers to reduce the environmental (if not carbon) footprint of research, while providing top-tier data on greenhouse gas emissions linked to laboratory operations. However, these efforts remain insufficient to comprehensively assess the various impacts associated with French research, particularly in the fields of engineering and emerging technologies. In particular, these actions do not take into account recent developments in environmental assessment methodologies, notably Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). LCA was initially developed to evaluate industrial products, manufactured identically at large scale, and derived from mature technical systems where reliable data can be collected, limiting temporal, spatial, and technological variability.
Currently, there is a strong European interest in the development of prospective or ex-ante LCA, applied to technologies under development in research projects, technologies that are inherently immature, prior to their large-scale market deployment. In this context, LCA should, according to van der Giesen et al. (2020), "anticipate avoidable potential environmental impacts", "avoid environmental lock-ins", "analyse the potential environmental impacts of a technology at an early stage of its development", and "avoid investments in technologies with high environmental impacts". This analysis also involves considering assumptions about the evolution of the socio-economic system at different geographical scales, which condition both the acceptability of certain technoscientific proposals and their relevance in terms of reducing environmental impacts, for example, based on planetary boundaries.
This session will bring together actors involved in the environmental assessment of scientific research projects, and will review 1) the approaches used to assess the environmental impact of research as it is currently carried out, but above all 2) the methodological developments that will make it possible to assess the impact of future uses. des innovations technologiques issues des laboratoires de recherche. Dans cette optique d’évaluation prospective sur le cycle de vie, il s’agira notamment de discuter des verrous scientifiques à lever, relatifs à la disponibilité de données de premier plan représentatives du système technologique en cours de développement, aux projections quant au « futur paysage de déploiement de la technologie », et à la prise en compte des « deep » incertitudes afférentes. Ces verrous renvoient à la prise en compte, pour l’évaluation environnementale d’une technologie, des changements d’échelle qu’impliquent son déploiement (Shibasaki et al 2007 ; Piccinno et al 2016), de son niveau de maturité technologique (TRL) et des incertitudes sur les résultats (Groen et al 2014 ; Igos et al 2019).
|
Evaluation environnementale d'un programme de recherche : proposition d'un cadre méthodologique
Myriam Saadé1, Anne-Cécile Orgerie2, Serge Verdeyme3, Guillaume Villemaud4
1UTOPII, CNRS, AMU, ENSAM, ENPC, INSA Lyon, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; 2Univ. Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA, France; 3Université de Limoges, France; 4INSA Lyon, France
Modélisation de l’arrière-plan en prospective : une revue critique des pratiques courantes
Denise Tavares Lima de Almeida1, Gabriel Valencia-Blatière1,2, Bo Pedersen Weidema2, Guilherme Magacho3
1Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, France; 2Université d'Aalborg, Danemark; 3Agence Française de Développement, France
Vers une évaluation multicritère des impacts environnementaux de la recherche
Philippe Loubet1, Anthony Benoist2, Jérôme Mariette3, André Estevez-Torres4
1Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM (UMR 5255), Talence; 2CIRAD, UPR BioWooEB, Saint-Denis, Réunion; 3INRAE, Toulouse; 4Université de Lille, CNRS, LASIRE (UMR 8516), Villeneuve d'Ascq
How to Conduct Lab-Scale LCA Meaningfully? Lessons learned from a case study on Photovoltaics
A. Kamal Kamali1, Guido Sonnemann1, Bertrand Laratte2,3
1Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, ISM, UMR 5255, Groupe Analyse du Cycle de Vie et Chimie Durable (CyVi), 351 Cours de la Libération, F-33405 Talence, Cédex, France; 2Department of Wood and Forest Sciences, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; 3Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France
Réflexions sur la soutenabilité environnementale absolue des infrastructures de recherche: positionnement sur les principes de partage.
Lucas Riondet1,2, Severin Valla2, Sacha Hodencq2
1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G-SCOP, 38000 Grenoble, France; 2Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, G2Elab, 38000 Grenoble, France
|