Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th July 2026, 03:49:30am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |||
D13: Labour Supply, Welfare Eligibility, and Minimum Income Schemes
| |||
| Presentations | |||
Labor Supply Response to Benefit Salience Under Risk of Unemployment University of Freiburg / Walter Eucken Institut, Germany This study investigates how the connection of taxation to public benefits can decrease tax payers' perceived tax burden, affecting their labor-leisure decision. We present a model of tax and benefit (mis)-perception, in which payoff maximizing work effort increases when the perceived tax burden decreases. Increasing the salience of benefits funded by taxation and the probability of receiving them decreases this perceived tax burden. We use two real-effort online experiments to test the suppositions of the model. In a flat tax system, we find that lack of information on the accrual of benefits increases perceived tax burden and decreases labor supply. In a progressive tax system, we find that full benefit salience improves motivation to remain in the unemployment insurance system and that effort increases under benefit salience when the unemployment rate is high. As such, behavioral responses to the salience of benefits also requires the expectation of their need.
Immigrant Labor Supply Responses to Welfare Eligibility 1VATT, Finland; 2Helsinki GSE; 3Aalto University Immigrants’ access to welfare benefits and public services is central to immigration policy debates, yet credible evidence on how eligibility affects labor supply remains limited. We study this question using a natural experiment, where Ukrainian refugees unexpectedly became eligible for a broad set of welfare benefits and public services after 12 months of residence in Finland. Using high-frequency administrative data, we compare monthly employment and earnings trajectories of Ukrainian refugees to similar migrants whose welfare eligibility was unaffected. We find substantial but incomplete take-up of benefits but a decline in labor supply after eligibility: employment falls by about 4 percentage points and earnings by 13 percent in the first year. For refugees with children, access to childcare services increases labor supply relative to non-parents. Exploiting regional variation in coverage, we show that early access to immigrant training mitigates employment losses, although part of the short-run decline reflects full-time language-training enrollment.
Minimum Income Schemes indexation in EU-27 JRC Seville, Spain This paper examines the effectiveness of Minimum Income Schemes (MIS) across EU-27 countries during the high inflation period of 2021-2024. Using microsimulation techniques, we analyse how well MIS parameters kept pace with inflation and assess their capacity to protect vulnerable households from monetary poverty. Our results suggest that countries with automatic indexation mechanisms demonstrate superior poverty outcomes with respect to those lacking formal indexation mechanisms or implementing insufficient adjustments. Moreover, in some countries MIS seem able to mitigate a large part of the increase in poverty rates, while in others they have a limited potential to do so, even with optimal indexation conditions. This work demonstrates that the interaction between indexation mechanisms and underlying design features, such as coverage, generosity and eligibility criteria, fundamentally shapes the schemes’ distributional outcomes.
| |||

