Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:40:56am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
B14: Collecting Taxes: Administration, Politics, and Enforcement
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Does Intermunicipal Cooperation Decrease Property Tax Gap? Evidence from Italy. 1: Department of Economics, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, Italy; 2: Department of Economics, Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy Inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) offers the scale economies of larger jurisdictions while preserving local political autonomy, yet the literature has assessed it almost entirely through expenditure efficiency, overlooking state capacity and tax enforcement. We investigate whether pooling administrative functions through IMC reduces the municipal property tax gap in Italy. Using official tax gap estimates and an Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) approach, we find significant heterogeneity. In the Center-South, where administrative capacity is lower, cooperation on core fiscal-administrative functions is associated with an approximately 6.3 percentage-point reduction in the tax gap, consistent with a catch-up mechanism. Conversely, the marginal effect in the more compliant North is statistically zero. A counterfactual simulation estimates that extending cooperation to untreated municipalities in the Center-South could recover approximately 290 million EUR annually. These findings highlight the value of targeted incentives aimed at low-capacity jurisdictions, where the potential to strengthen enforcement and maximize revenue recovery is highest.
Can Revenue Autonomy Strengthen Local Fiscal Resilience in Korea? Evidence from Jeju’s Asymmetric Decentralization Reform 1: Jeju National University, South Korea; 2: Hannam University, South Korea This study evaluates whether asymmetric fiscal decentralization improves local revenue management in Korea. Jeju Special Self-Governing Province gained enhanced authority over local taxation under the Jeju Special Act in 2006. Using panel data for Korea’s upper-tier local governments (1996–2023), we apply the synthetic control method to estimate causal effects on the local tax ratio, tax collection rate, and accumulated arrears-to-total revenue ratio. The local tax ratio falls in 2006–2012 but rises thereafter, increasing by about 4.6 percentage points on average in 2013–2023 and significant at the 10% level. In contrast, collection and arrears indicators show no statistically significant improvement. Revenue autonomy can raise own-source revenue capacity, but improvements in revenue administration appear to require complementary accountability mechanisms.
The Political Economy of Tax Expenditures: Evidence for OECD Countries 1: Luiss University; 2: Paris Dauphine-PSL University; 3: Università di Roma La Sapienza, Italy; 4: University of Urbino Carlo Bo' Governments channel substantial fiscal policy through tax expenditures rather than through visible public spending, despite the well-known inefficiencies of tax expenditures. We argue that the politically relevant margin is not aggregate fiscal cost, but fragmentation into numerous legally distinct provisions, which reduces salience and weakens budget scrutiny. We develop a political-economy model with a rent-seeking firm, a vote-maximising politician, and a Treasury with enforcement capacity, micro-founding structural opacity as a function of the number of provisions. The model predicts that stronger Treasury enforcement unambiguously reduces fragmentation, while its effect on aggregate revenue foregone is theoretically ambiguous. Using a cross-country panel dataset from the Global Tax Expenditures Database and an instrumental-variables strategy based on the cultural substitution between exclusive family ties and generalised trust, we find that higher social capital significantly reduces the number of provisions but has no systematic effect on aggregate revenue foregone.
Public Demand Allocation and Productivity of the Private Sector 1: University of Bologna; 2: University of Tübingen We study whether the effects of public demand depend on recipient firms' fundamentals. Using quasi-random variation in Italian public works allocation, we compare firms receiving similar public resources but differing in cost efficiency. More cost-efficient recipients experience about 70 percent higher productivity growth over three years, with stronger effects for smaller firms, larger awards, and local or lower-screening public bodies. Gains operate through business expansion: private revenues rise by 74 percent more, with no clear effects on borrowing, long-term debt, fixed investment, or future public activity. Simulations imply productivity gains of about 5 percent in the construction sector.
| ||||

