Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th July 2026, 03:47:49am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
G06: Household Economics: Marriage, Divorce and Retirement
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Retirement After Divorce: A Life-Cycle Model of Pensions, Divorce and Retirement 1University of Copenhagen, Denmark; 2University of Oxford Countries differ widely in whether pension wealth is divided at divorce or remains separate property. This paper provides the first evidence on how such policies shape divorce behavior, labor supply, and late-life outcomes. Using rich administrative data, we document that divorce is linked to delayed retirement for women in systems where pensions are not shared. We then develop a dynamic structural model of household bargaining, divorce, and retirement to evaluate counterfactual pension-splitting rules. Relative to a no-compensation benchmark, introducing pension division at divorce substantially lowers retirement ages among divorced women, while effects for divorced men and married couples are small or negligible. For an equivalent transfer, labor supply responses are markedly stronger for women than for men. When public pension benefits are means-tested against other income, overall state pension expenditures rise slightly, as behavioral labor supply responses more than offset the mechanical reduction in pension wealth inequality generated by sharing.
Savings Behavior during Retirement University of Mannheim, Germany This paper studies savings behavior and its determinants in old age. A large empirical literature documents low drawdown of wealth late in life. I confirm this result in the context of the Netherlands, where there are extensive public insurance schemes covering both health and care expenditures. To investigate the determinants of this observed behavior, I provide suggestive evidence that bequest motives cannot fully account for this empirical finding. The results have implications for the retirement consumption smoothing benefits of private saving in working life, and is important in considering how to insure retirees against risks such as long-term care late in life.
Limited Commitment In Older Couples 1University of Oxford; 2University of Copenhagen This paper studies to what extent marital and cohabitation decisions respond to financial incentives in a state pension. As is common in many benefit programs around the world, the Danish state pension pays more to individuals living alone to make up for the higher cost of living for singles. In response, at the age cutoff for eligibility, the likelihood of living alone jumps up by 0.2\% pt. due to both an increase in separation and divorce risk for existing couples and a fall in the likelihood of moving in with a new partner. By focusing on a subsample of individuals and couples already retired, it can be ruled out that this is due to retirement itself, which commonly takes place under an early retirement program which is not means-tested.
Marriage Decision And Domestic Violence: A Game Theoretic Analysis University Bonn, Germany This paper provides a non-cooperative model of domestic violence that models the decision to enter a marriage and the decision to abuse one’s partner. The effect of policy interventions on aggregate abuse rates is decomposed into a marriage-rate effect and an abuse-rate effect, which are analysed separately. The model predicts that lower divorce costs increase marriage rates while decreasing abuse rates. Improvements in women’s outside options relative to the surplus from marriage can have ambiguous effects on abuse, with the potential to either reduce or exacerbate it. In contrast, policies that widen the utility gap between single and married men are predicted to lower abuse rates. By explicitly distinguishing between the marriage-rate and the abuse-rate effect, this framework highlights how policies aimed at reducing domestic violence may have adverse effects.
| ||||

