Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th July 2026, 03:48:15am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
G08: Labour Supply, Work Arrangements, and Employment Programmes
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Demand for Employment Services in a Basic Income Experiment VATT Institute for Economic Research, Finland This study provides causal evidence on how unconditional income support affects engagement with employment services. We analyse the Finnish basic income experiment, which replaced minimum unemployment benefits with a guaranteed income for 2,000 randomly selected unemployed individuals and removed all job-search requirements while leaving the supply of public employment services unchanged. Using administrative registers, we find a 5–6 pp decline in employment plans, and a 9 pp reduction in active labour market programmes. The decline is concentrated in programmes targeting individuals with the weakest employment prospects, while sanctions for non-compliance increase. These estimates likely represent lower-bound effects, as many treated individuals continued to claim unemployment benefits and remained subject to job-search requirements.
Substitutes or Complements? Evidence on Peer Effects from the Public Sector Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel This paper examines the labor supply externalities of peer working hours within the public sector. I exploit a rigid Israeli policy rule that requires mothers of young children to increase their daily shifts from 7.5 to 8 hours upon their child’s first birthday. Using this exogenous variation in a window-restricted instrumental variables framework, I find that peer labor supply acts as a strategic substitute. A one-hour increase in peer working hours causes a 6-minute reduction in a worker’s own labor supply. Heterogeneity analysis supports a “free-riding” mechanism: the substitution effect is more pronounced in large teams and during periods of remote work, while it reverses to complementarity when the peer is a manager. Dynamic reduced-form estimates reveal that this effect is transitory, dissipating within three months as teams re-optimize.
The Impact of Short-Time Work Subsidies on Individual Employment Trajectories 1ETH Zürich, Switzerland; 2University of Bolzano We provide causal evidence on the effects of short-time work (STW) subsidies on individual short‑ and medium‑run labor market outcomes. Comparing workers in firms whose STW applications were approved to otherwise similar workers in firms whose applications were rejected, we find that access to STW leads to higher employment income and a reduced risk of unemployment. These effects, however, fade out in the second year after treatment. Around half of the employment income effect stems from the intensive margin of falling unemployed with the other half attributable to lower wages for workers with rejected STW applications. The unemployment‑reducing effect is concentrated among low‑income employees, whereas high‑income employees benefit primarily through improved earnings.
How Capital-Labor Interactions Shape Minimum Wage Competition 1Graduate School of Economics and Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Tokyo, Japan; 2Business School, Hunan University, China This paper develops a two-region model of interjurisdictional minimum wage competition, demonstrating that such competition yields an inefficient minimum wage even in the absence of labor mobility. The inefficiency arises because mobile capital-whether technologically complementary to or substitutable for labor-drives strategic interaction across jurisdictions. The analysis yields two main findings. First, minimum wage competition unambiguously results in an equilibrium wage that falls short of the social optimum, irrespective of the nature of capital-labor technological interaction. Second, once capital taxation becomes an available policy instrument, the technological relationship between capital and labor determines whether the equilibrium minimum wage is excessive or insufficient.
| ||||

