Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 18th July 2026, 02:38:12am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |||
G01: Capital Gains Taxation: Design, Avoidance and Distortions
| |||
    | |||
5:00pm - 5:22pm
Tackling the Timing Trap in Capital Gains Taxation Skatteforsk - Norwegian Centre for Tax Research, Norway This paper addresses issues in the design of current capital gains tax systems and how to tackle them. Important among such issues is an incentive to delay realisation. We explore alternative policies to mitigate issues in capital gains taxation, such as taxation on accrual, interest rate adjustments on delayed tax payments, indexing of capital gains and a rate of return allowance, and applying tax rules based on accrual and tax payments on realization. Whereas capital gains are measurable on realisation, measuring capital gains before realisation poses a challenge. We address this by exploiting Norwegian tax register data and machine learning methods. From this, we show revenue and incidence effects of the proposed alternatives. WE SUBMIT ONLY EXTENDED ABSTRACT - FULL PAPER WILL BE READY BY AUGUST
5:22pm - 5:45pm
Behavioral Effects of Capital Gains Taxes on Residential Property Sales 1University of Göttingen; 2Leibniz University Hannover, Germany; 3University of Mannheim This paper uses population-wide Norwegian administrative data on property transactions, income, wealth, registered residence, and meter-level electricity consumption to study avoidance of the owner-occupation capital gains exemption. We document a sharp spike in sales exactly at the one-year eligibility threshold, driven entirely by gain realizations and strongest for high-gain transactions. Higher taxable gains significantly increase relocation rates, but electricity data show that most of this response reflects “on paper” moves. These findings imply substantially reduced effective taxation of housing gains and potentially distorted portfolio allocation.
5:45pm - 6:07pm
All Your Basis are Belong to Us: How Tax Basis Complexity Distorts Economic Behavior 1University of Texas at Austin; 2University of Pennsylvania; 3Northeastern University, United States of America Tax basis is often treated as a simple accounting measure, yet in practice it creates powerful avoidance incentives and meaningful economic distortions. We survey basis-driven behavior from unilateral decisions to complex, multi-party transactions. In single-actor settings—such as cryptocurrencies, step-up in basis, and like-kind exchanges—housing markets bunch at the $500,000 capital gains exemption, implying an elasticity of taxable gains of 0.23. Homeowners also adjust basis through strategic improvements, especially where disclosure is limited. Two-party distortions include conservation easements, avoidance-motivated charitable giving, installment sales, and ETF in-kind contributions, which facilitate deferral and effective basis resetting; these contributions have grown from $5 million to $3 billion in 2025. In multi-party contexts, basis rules affect partnerships, acquisitions, and stock splits. Following a 2008 reform requiring broker basis reporting, annual stock splits fell by roughly 99 percent. Overall, basis complexity generates deadweight loss through misallocation, transaction costs, and rent-seeking.
| |||
