Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:07:44am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
D04: VAT Evasion, Enforcement, and Export Rebates
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Making VAT Production Efficient: Direct and Spillover Effects of Immediate Refunds 1: Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 2: Peking University; 3: University of California, Irvine; 4: Xiamen University This study investigates China's recent Value-Added Tax (VAT) immediate refund reform aimed at improving production efficiency. Utilizing detailed firm-level data from 2009 to 2019, we explore how allowing immediate refunds of excess VAT input credit affects firm growth, and how these impacts propagate through supply chains. Our findings show that immediate refunds spur firm growth through two channels: (1) by providing liquidity to firms previously burdened by persistent excess VAT credit, and (2) by reducing the marginal cost of any refund-generating activities such as large investment and input expansions. These direct effects also result in positive growth spillovers to upstream industries leading to a likely net-tax revenue increase. We also show that the benefits of statutory immediate refund mandates can be limited by the local administrative environment.
Missing Trader VAT Fraud: Evidence From Cross-Border Audits In The EU 1: ZEW Mannheim & University of Münster; 2: University of Mannheim, Germany Missing trader fraud is widely viewed as a major source of VAT revenue loss in the EU, yet existing evidence remains limited and largely based on indirect or aggregate measures. We use administrative audit data covering firm-to-firm cross-border transactions across all EU Member States to study this fraud. We first document new facts on its extent and nature, showing that detected fraud is concentrated across a few borders in Eastern and Southern Europe, in the retail sector, and among small rapidly expanding firms. We then examine the effectiveness of two policy instruments, tax audits and the reverse charge mechanism (RCM) in curbing this fraud. Event-study estimates show that tax audits have substantial effects: following detection, many missing traders exit while surviving firms contract, with similar dynamics observed among exporting trade partners. In contrast, RCM lead to substitution of fraud to neighboring non-treated sub-sectors, limiting overall deterrence effects and reducing its impact.
Can Export VAT Rebate Be Passed Through? 1: Hebei University of Economics and Business, China, People's Republic of; 2: University of International Business and Economics, China, People's Republic of; 3: Hohai University, China, People's Republic of The indirect tax burdens are generally assumed to be shifted fully or predominantly to buyers. Does the same logic apply to export VAT rebates? This study examines the tax incidence of export VAT rebates both empirically and theoretically. We take advantage of China's 2004 export VAT rebate as a natural experiment, and estimate the pass-through rate by employing the difference-in-differences approach. Combining the comprehensive product-level data from China Customs (2003-2004) and detailed export rebate rate information, we find that exporters bear 100% of the export VAT rebate burden. We further show that this reduction of export VAT rebates significantly lowers export quantities and values. We then develop a theoretical model examining the tax incidence of export rebates from one country. This model rationalizes our empirical finding that the burden cannot be shifted to foreign buyers. Our paper provides an insight into the distributional effects of export tax rebate policies.
Randomized Response, Systematic Bias: Evidence From Vat Evasion University of Mannheim, Germany Self-employment income goes partly unreported in tax records and surveys. We measure how much, and who under-reports, combining a meta-analysis of 690 Pissarides-Weber expenditure-method estimates from 41 studies with an application to the Household Finance and Consumption Survey. Corrected for publication selection, the under-reported share, measured relative to wage earners, lies between 0.17 and 0.26; the raw literature mean of 0.24 sits near the top of this range. The survey reads 0.14 on total food, the measure the literature mostly uses, and 0.24 on food away from home, inside the range. Within the self-employed, employers under-report 0.27 of true income on total food and own-account workers $0.08$; the gap comes from incorporation, since incorporated own-account workers under-report like incorporated employers. Correcting reported income moves the self-employed from the median to about the 52nd to 54th percentile.
| ||||

