Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:40:57am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
C01: Inequality and Redistribution through the Lens of DINA
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Racial Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Apartheid South Africa 1: EU-Tax Observatory - Paris School of Economics; 2: World Bank We study post-Apartheid inequality dynamics in South Africa using a new microdatabase that combines survey, tax, national accounts, and budget data from 1993 to 2019. Until 2005, pretax inequality rose, racial disparities widened, and redistribution stagnated. Thereafter, pretax inequality fell back toward its 1993 level, while major expansions in tax-and-transfer progressivity sharply reduced posttax inequality. Rapid growth of top Black incomes contributed to halving the White-to-Black pretax income ratio and shifted 20% of taxes from Whites to top Black earners. Despite reaching its lowest point in history in 2019, the racial gap remains extreme by international standards, even after redistribution.
Income, Wealth, and Redistribution in a Tax Haven: Distributional National Accounts for Switzerland 1: KOF Institute ETH Zurich, Switzerland; 2: CESifo; 3: CEPR We analyze the composition and distribution of national income, private wealth, and the extent of redistribution in Switzerland, combining micro tax, survey, and national accounts data, covering 2003–2022. Constructing Distributional National Accounts (DINA) requires addressing two features of the Swiss setting. Switzerland is a tax haven, so we correct for cross-border profit shifting by multinationals. It is also fiscally decentralized: no nationally representative tax micro-data exist; we reweight cantonal tax records to match national distributions. We find that pre-tax income inequality is substantially higher than tax statistics suggest, with the top 1% income share 50% larger once retained earnings and privileged dividends are included. Wealth inequality is intermediate relative to existing estimates and, unlike those estimates, shows no pronounced upward trend. The overall Swiss tax-and-transfer system is close to flat across most of the distribution, at around 45% of pre-tax income, declining to below 30% for the top 0.01%.
Tax Progressivity and Inequality in Brazil: Evidence from Integrated Administrative Data 1: Paris School of Economics; 2: Receita Federal do Brasil; 3: World Bank We use population-wide administrative micro-data to provide new estimates of income inequality and effective tax rates by income groups in Brazil. Our data allow us to link businesses to their owners and thus to allocate business income and associated taxes to the corresponding individual firm owners. We provide sharp upward revisions to official inequality estimates: the top 1% earns 27.4% of total income in 2019, one of the highest level recorded in the world. The tax system, which relies heavily on consumption taxes, is regressive: while the average tax rate in the economy is 42.5%, this rate falls to 20.6% for million-dollar earners (roughly the top 0.01%), due to the non-taxation of dividends and provisions that reduce corporate tax liabilities. We provide evidence suggesting that inequality in developing countries may be systematically underestimated, as even in Brazil - where dividends are untaxed - attributing profits to business owners substantially raises income inequality.
When Capitalism Takes Over Socialism: The Lasting Economic Divide Between East And West Germany 1: Uni Leipzig; 2: IWH, Germany; 3: SVR In this paper, we investigate the economic divide between East and West German residents along the regional income and wealth distributions employing the Distributional National Accounts method, which aligns microdata with national accounts. We find that East German residents still earn and own a fraction of their West German counterparts. The gap widens towards the top of the distribution due to East Germans’ lower business income and wealth. Investigating the causes, we find that reunification boosted West German top incomes. We link this to the privatization process of the 1990s in which pre-dominantly top West German investors acquired formerly state-owned East German capital and received higher returns on their investment. Persistent characteristics of businesses owned by either East or West Germans, such as the number of employees, firm structure and legal form, explain a rising share of the persistent productivity gap.
| ||||

