Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:06:47am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||||
C07: VAT Compliance, Refunds, and Tax Administration
| ||||
| Presentations | ||||
Crossing the Line: Firm Responses to VAT Registration in Germany 1: ZEW Mannheim, Germany; 2: University of Mannheim Value-added tax (VAT) registration thresholds are among the most common size-based regulations worldwide, yet existing evidence has focused mainly on firms’ avoidance behavior below these thresholds. This paper studies what happens when small firms enter the VAT regime. We use newly available German administrative tax data covering the near-universeof firms and exploit the €17,500 VAT registration threshold. To comapre crossing and noncrossing firms we combine a dynamic difference-in-discontinuities design with a donut RD approach. Due to data protection reasons we cannot disclose the full paper publicly.
Improving VAT Compliance by Switching Who Remits the Tax: Evidence From Construction Firms 1: University of Helsinki, Finland and Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research (FIT); 2: VATT Institute for Economic Research (VATT) and Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research (FIT); 3: VATT Institute for Economic Research (VATT) and Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research (FIT) Many countries use a reverse charge mechanism (RC) in the value added tax (VAT) system to combat tax evasion in specific high-risk sectors. The RC shifts the liability to remit VAT from the seller to the buyer. We study the adoption of RC in the construction sector in Finland in 2011 using tax return data on the universe of Finnish firms. Using a difference-in-differences design, we find that reported net VAT liabilities in the construction sector increased by 5%. According to our results, changing the remittance policy decreased VAT evasion by small subcontractors that provide services for large firms. Using a theoretical model, we show that reverse charge increases tax revenue relative to conventional VAT unless downstream firms increase tax evasion beyond the level previously undertaken by upstream firms, a response that requires a high degree of non-compliance.
Tax Refund Delays and Firm Performance: Evidence from Zambia 1: UNU-WIDER, Finland; 2: National University of Singapore; 3: Zambia Revenue Authority We examine the economic consequences of delayed Value Added Tax (VAT) refunds in developing countries, using a novel administrative dataset covering the universe of VAT refund claims in Zambia. We document severe delays in refund processing, with firms waiting, on average, nearly 700 days for reimbursement—over 20 times the statutory processing period. Merging refund records with the universe of firms' VAT and Corporate Income Tax (CIT) filings, we show that prolonged refund delays have substantial adverse effects on firm performance, reducing sales, taxable purchases, profits, investment, and employment. To address the endogeneity of refund delays, we exploit plausibly exogenous variation in administrative congestion using a leave-one-out measure of the average delay experienced by other firms entering the refund system at the same time. The instrumental-variable estimates indicate that the economic costs of refund delays are large and persistent, consistent with firms facing binding working-capital constraints while awaiting reimbursement.
Reform Journeys: The Evolution of VAT Misreporting in Kenya 1: Kenya Revenue Authority; 2: University of Copenhagen, Denmark Institutional change tends to arise from "reform journeys", where incremental changes—rather than one-off events—lead to long-run progress. This paper studies the evolution of VAT misreporting in Kenya during a period of sustained administrative reform using firm-to-firm transaction data from 2016 to 2023. We document widespread underreporting of VAT liabilities, especially on the extensive margin, and a sharp decline in this behaviour over time. Using a fixed-effects regression model that allocates reporting discrepancies to buyers or sellers, we show how systematic misreporting varies across firm size, sectors, and tax offices. Eliminating firms’ misreporting would have increased KRA's tax revenue by KSH 597 billion (40% of VAT payable). The negative revenue impact has decreased significantly over time, highlighting improvements in KRA's tax capacity during a sustained reform period.
| ||||

