Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:37:38am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
C15: Retirement, Saving, and Disability Insurance Location: Room 118 (Francesinhas 1) | |
    | |
Social Reference and Voluntary Public Pension Participation: Evidence from Institutional Variation in South Korea 1: Jeju National University, Jeju, Republic of Korea; 2: Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 3: Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Public pension systems with mandatory coverage often retain a voluntary enrollment margin, yet take-up varies sharply across localities under common statutory rules. Using a panel of 232 Korean municipalities over 2003–2024, we distinguish participation prevalence from the density of settings generating repeated interpersonal contact. Prevalence excludes voluntary enrollees by construction and is instrumented with registered-workplace density. The first stage is modest, and weak-instrument-robust Anderson–Rubin tests fail to reject a zero prevalence effect in every specification (preferred model: p = 0.219; 95 percent set [−0.887, 16.411]). By contrast, private-academy density is positively and precisely associated with voluntary enrollment across fixed-effects and IV specifications and three denominators: a one-standard-deviation increase corresponds to about 405 additional enrollees per million residents, 14 percent of the mean. The association strengthens with the municipal female-to-male ratio and is steeper for female enrollment. Because academy density is not instrumented, these are conditional associations, not causal effects.
| |
