Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:38:48am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
D11: Housing Inequality and Transaction Taxes Location: Room 112 (Francesinhas 1) | |
    | |
Housing Inequality 1: University of Illinois, United States of America; 2: Federal Reserve Board, United States of America We document patterns of inequality in housing prices and rents housing since 1930, using Census data. First, housing inequality fell from 1930 to 1970 and rose thereafter, with a sharper fall and gentler rise than income inequality. Second, home-ownership rose considerably when inequality fell, but stayed steady when it grew. Third, the fall in housing inequality was most pronounced at the lower end, as the cheapest units without water or electricity disappeared. Fourth, the post-1970 rise was driven more by owner-occupied than rented units. Fifth, rising inequality is explained more by growing spatial differences across neighborhoods than by changing structural characteristics.
| |
