Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics:
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair. (Exception: invited sessions)
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.iseg.ulisboa.pt/en/event/iipf/ .
Venue address: ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics & Management, R. Francesinhas 21, 1200-675 Lisboa, Portugal
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 17th Sept 2026, 11:40:00am WEST
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
G10: Local Governance, Discretion, and Public Procurement Location: Room 110 (Francesinhas 1) | |
    | |
Organizational Culture and Habit Formation in Public Procurement 1: University of Turku, Finland; 2: Hanken School of Economics, Finland; 3: RBB Economics, Finland; 4: Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority, Finland We study the extent of a one-size- fits-all approach in the design of public procurement (PP) tenders using comprehensive data from Finland. We show that crucial PP design features related to auction and contract rules tend to have signi ficant lack of variation across different tenders for different industries within a contracting authority. We show that this organizational rigidness is due to both organizational level culture and individual employee level work habit formation with the latter being more important. We find that both greater organizational rigidity and deviating from the national industry norms are associated with lower number of bids and higher probability of zero-bid tenders, pointing to a potential efficiency loss from organizational rigidness in PP, and offering a solution that buyers should mimic how other organizations typically buy similar products rather than how they themselves buy very different products.
| |
