Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.

Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.

Some information on the session logistics:

If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.

Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.

Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.usiu.ac.ke/iipf/ .

Venue address: United States International University Africa, USIU Road, Off Thika Road (Exit 7, Kenya), P.O. Box 14634, 00800 Nairobi, Kenya

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 9th Oct 2025, 01:17:22am EAT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
B09: Microsimulation and Benefits
Time:
Wednesday, 20/Aug/2025:
2:15pm - 4:15pm

Session Chair: Snorre Skagseth, Statistics Norway
Discussant 1: Takeshi Miyazaki, Kyushu University
Discussant 2: Snorre Skagseth, Statistics Norway
Discussant 3: Timo Meiendresch, Fraunhofer FIT
Location: SS12


Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Unclaimed Benefits: Non-Take-Up of German Means-Tested Benefits

Timo Meiendresch1,2

1Fraunhofer FIT, Germany; 2University of Freiburg, Germany

This study estimates non-take-up rates for three German means-tested benefits and examines their determinants. While prior research has largely focused on basic income support, less is known about housing allowance (“Wohngeld”) and supplementary child benefits (“Kinderzuschlag”), despite their rising importance and related nature. Employing a microsimulation model based on official Mikrozensus data that replicates the German tax and benefit system, the analysis reveals higher non-take-up rates for housing allowance and supplementary child benefits compared to basic income support. Moreover, cross-benefit analysis indicates that participation in one scheme may affect engagement in others, while regression results offer novel insights into access barriers.

Meiendresch-Unclaimed Benefits-379.pdf


Redistributive Effects of Consumption Tax and Income Tax: Evidence from Household Level Data

Takeshi Miyazaki, Liang Shuyi

Kyushu University, Japan

This paper examines the impact of Japan’s consumption taxes on the income distribution from 1989 to 2014. Using micro-level data from the National Survey of Family Income and Expenditure (NFSIE), we apply statutory tax rates to calculate exact consumption tax burdens for each household and measure its redistributive effect by Reynolds-Smolensky index. The results suggest that consumption taxes in Japan are regressive and thus increasingly offset the redistribution efforts made by income taxes. The fixed income and consumption approach further confirms that changes in household spending and saving patterns have magnified this anti-redistributive effect. The findings underscore the need for targeted policy measures to reduce the burden on low-income groups.

Miyazaki-Redistributive Effects of Consumption Tax and Income Tax-270.pdf


Predicting Behavioral Effects of Tax Policy by External Evidence

Snorre Skagseth1, Zhiyang Jia1, Thor O. Thoresen1,2, Trine E. Vattø1

1Statistics Norway, Norway; 2Norwegian Fiscal Studies (University of Oslo)

Behavioral microsimulation models can be used to supplement results from non-behavioral tax-benefit models in policy-making. However, the policy analyst may not always have access to a fully developed behavioral simulation model for the policy issue in question. Here we draw attention to an alternative, which implies describing behavioral effects by using response estimates from other studies. We refer to this approach as “using external evidence”. We illustrate how tax revenue and distributional effect estimates can be derived by integrating external tax elasticity estimates into a non-behavioral tax-benefit model. The framework is illustrated using two examples from Norwegian tax policy.

Skagseth-Predicting Behavioral Effects of Tax Policy by External Evidence-334.pdf