JavaScript is Disabled
Your browser's JavaScript functionality is disabled. It has to be enabled to use this function of ConfTool. Here you can find information on how to enable JavaScript If you have any problems, please contact the organizers at info@iipf.org .
Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics :
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.usiu.ac.ke/iipf/ .
Venue address : United States International University Africa, USIU Road, Off Thika Road (Exit 7, Kenya), P.O. Box 14634, 00800 Nairobi, Kenya
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 9th Oct 2025, 01:15:36am EAT
G01: Water and Climate Adaptation
Time:
Friday, 22/Aug/2025:
2:15pm - 4:15pm
Session Chair: Juan Carlos Suarez Serrato , Stanford GSBDiscussant 1: Bart Defloor , Ghent UniversityDiscussant 2: Anna Zasova , UNU-WIDERDiscussant 3: Juan Carlos Suarez Serrato , Stanford GSBDiscussant 4: Emanuele Massetti , International Monetary Fund
Location: SS4
Presentations
2:15pm - 2:37pm Public Sector Capacities to Address Macro-Critical Concerns for Water Resilience
Emanuele Massetti , Junko Mochizuki, Suphachol Suphachalasai, Christine Richmond, Dora Benedek
International Monetary Fund, United States of America
Appropriate management of water requires greater policy coherence vis-a-vis macro-fiscal planning. This renewed emphasis calls for an improved analytical framing and strengthening of public sector capacities. The paper proposes an analytical framing of water resilience relevant to macro-fiscal planning termed ‘water value chain’ outlining channels through which water resilience affects the macroeconomy and a country’s fiscal position. Focusing on three major policy themes in the water value chain, namely: (i) management of water resources, (ii) ensuring adequate and reliable access, and (iii) enhancing the efficiency of water use, the paper further assesses public sector capacity building needs associated as identified in the IMF’s Climate Policy Diagnostic (CPD) and policy reforms being pursued under the IMF’s Resilience and Sustainability Facility (RSF).
2:37pm - 3:00pm Welfare Economic Analysis of Climate Change and Drought in Eastern Ethiopia
Bart Defloor , Haileyesus Girma Birhane
Ghent University, Belgium
Climate change leads to more severe periods of drought. Especially in drought prone regions as Ethiopia there are economic, environmental and social consequences. In this article we take a welfare economic perspective. There are welfare costs due to its direct cost, welfare costs related to risk aversion, and welfare costs related to the fact that drought might impact intertemporal variability.Then we focus on the equity aspect of drought. Increased drought has an impact on inequality as rich and poor households are impacted differently. We analyse the equity impact using the Atkinson Social Welfare Function and arrive at eight cost components: four efficiency related and four equity related. This information can be used to inform policymakers and to advise them which policy measures to take. It can inform about the welfare impact of different policy measures. We apply the approach to rural households in Eastern Ethiopia facing drought.
3:00pm - 3:22pm Raindrop in the Drought? Vulnerability to Climate Shocks and the Role of Social Protection in Zambia
Anna Zasova 1 , Katrin Gasior2 , Pia Rattenhuber1 , Adnan Shahir3,1
1 UNU-WIDER, Finland; 2 Southern African Social Policy Research Insights, UK; 3 University of Bologna
Zambia’s reliance on rain-fed agriculture makes its economy and population highly vulnerable to frequent droughts and irregular rainfall. This paper assesses the role of social protection, specifically the Social Cash Transfer (SCT) program, in mitigating drought-induced poverty and consumption declines. Using the MicroZAMOD microsimulation model and district-level rainfall data, we find that droughts significantly increase poverty and reduce household consumption, disproportionately affecting the poorest households. While the current SCT program provides some relief, reforms to eligibility criteria, particularly removing the household composition requirement, could improve targeting, expand coverage, and strengthen resilience against climate-related economic shocks.
3:22pm - 3:45pm Regulations, Public Goods, and Firm Adaptation: Evidence from Environmental Water Policy in China
Juan Carlos Suarez Serrato
Stanford GSB, United States of America
Environmental regulations can reduce economic output when firms struggle to adopt cleaner production methods. We examine how public infrastructure can complement regulations by mitigating their economic costs. Using detailed firm-level data and a staggered difference-in-differences design, we find that sewage treatment plants (STPs) provided by local governments significantly enhance wastewater treatment among polluting firms. This infrastructure provision reduced firms’ production adjustments required for regulatory compliance, attenuating output losses by approximately 30%. To further analyze optimal policy design, we develop an equilibrium model that captures the joint decision-making of governments in providing STPs and firms in managing wastewater discharge. Our model also quantifies the social welfare gains from increased public goods provision, offering insights into effective water environmental governance.