Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.

Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.

Some information on the session logistics:

If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.

Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.

Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.usiu.ac.ke/iipf/ .

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 12th July 2025, 05:36:30pm EAT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
F05: Taxes, Buoyancy, and Growth
Time:
Friday, 22/Aug/2025:
11:00am - 1:00pm

Session Chair: Andrey Timofeev, Georgia State University
Discussant 1: Hyejeong SIM, National Assembly Budget Office
Discussant 2: Aneesh K A, CHRIST University
Discussant 3: Andrey Timofeev, Georgia State University
Discussant 4: Elina Berghäll, VATT Institute for Economic Research

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

Tax Revenue and Growth in Africa

Elina Berghäll

VATT Institute for Economic Research, Finland

The positive correlation of tax to GDP and GDP per capita at the global level suggests that developing country growth reduces aid dependence by mobilizing domestic revenues (DRM) to finance public expenditure. Income status upgrades by the World Bank represent milestones in this transition and may anticipate a decline in aid precipitating an increase in tax collection to complement the shortfall in government revenue. Applying the synthetic control method (SCM) and synthetic difference-in-differences (SDID) to countries with sufficient data in the UNU-WIDER GRD tax database and the WDI, I investigate whether the income status upgrades raise tax and other government revenue in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). With few exceptions, results show that upgrades induce a rise in government/ tax revenue in per capita terms relative to countries within the same income group, but not relative to GDP. Extensive robustness checks confirm that per capita growth does raise the share of tax revenue in GDP.

Berghäll-Tax Revenue and Growth in Africa-184.pdf


Real Asset Market Incompleteness and Tax Policy

Hyejeong SIM

National Assembly Budget Office, Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

This study aims to shed light on the cyclicality of tax policy. The result shows that tax policy in Korea is a-cyclical. One notable feature is a strong relationship between house prices and tax policy. The empirical results show a positive relationship between housing prices and tax rate reduction bills and a negative relationship with tax rate increase bills. This result implies that tax rate reduction is strengthened when the housing market is strong, and conversely, tax rate increase is strengthened when the housing market is weak. Based on this result, this paper argues that asset market imperfections lead to procyclical tax policies. Since the 2000s, real asset markets have had a greater impact on tax revenue fluctuations, and unexpectedly high tax revenues during the real estate boom have led to tax rate reductions.

SIM-Real Asset Market Incompleteness and Tax Policy-132.pdf


Fiscal Deficit Under the Fiscal Rule Regime in India: The Role of Disinvestment of PSEs

Aneesh K A, Susmita Kalyani

CHRIST University, India

Since 1991, India’s central government has actively pursued disinvestment of Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs). However, the strategic sale of well-performing PSEs like Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. and Air India has drawn criticism, raising concerns about undervaluation and deviation from stated policy objectives. This paper examines the rationale, debates, and fiscal implications of disinvestment in India. Empirically, it analyzes disinvestment proceeds post-1991, particularly after the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act of 2003, to assess their role in managing fiscal deficits. The findings indicate that disinvestment revenues, both current and lagged, have been used as a fiscal tool, questioning whether the policy aligns with long-term economic efficiency or serves as a short-term revenue strategy. The study contributes to the discourse on whether disinvestment enhances economic sustainability or merely addresses fiscal constraints without structural reforms.

K A-Fiscal Deficit Under the Fiscal Rule Regime in India-385.pdf


Reconciling Tax Buoyancy and Tax Capacity

Andrey Timofeev

Georgia State University, United States of America

I attempt to reconcile two vast strands of literature that essentially estimate the same empirical relationship. Tax effort studies aim to benchmark a country’s tax-to-GDP ratio to tax outcomes observed in other countries under comparable conditions, in particular under similar levels of economic development, proxied with the real GDP per capita. A completely separate strand of literature deals with estimating tax buoyancy, which is measured as the percentage change in tax revenue associated with a one per cent change in GDP. While dealing with some of the same data as in the tax effort studies, the tax buoyancy literature has developed more robust econometric methods. In this paper, I show that an estimate of long-run buoyancy can be translated into the magnitude of the impact of economic development on the tax-to-GDP ratio by making adjustments for how the population size and real exchange rate interact with economic growth.

Timofeev-Reconciling Tax Buoyancy and Tax Capacity-252.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: IIPF 2025
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.154+CC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany