Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.

Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.

Some information on the session logistics:

If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.

Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.

Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.usiu.ac.ke/iipf/ .

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 12th July 2025, 01:56:13pm EAT

 
 
Session Overview
Session
F10: Tax Enforcement and Nudges
Time:
Friday, 22/Aug/2025:
11:00am - 1:00pm

Session Chair: Gayline Migide Vuluku, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Discussant 1: Fredrick Manang, University of Dodoma (UDOM)
Discussant 2: Giovanni Occhiali, Institute of Development Studies
Discussant 3: Gayline Migide Vuluku, Vienna University of Economics and Business
Discussant 4: Celeste Scarpini, International Centre for Tax and Development (ICTD)

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

The Interpersonal Side Of Tax Compliance: Interactions Between Taxpayers And Tax Officials In Rwanda

Giulia Mascagni1, Celeste Scarpini1, Denis Mukama2, Fabrizio Santoro1, Naphtal Hakizimana2

1International Centre for Tax and Development; 2Rwanda Revenue Authority

The role of interactions between taxpayers and tax officials in shaping compliance strategies remains unexplored in the literature on tax administration and compliance in developing countries. Nevertheless, practically, taxpayers' experience is shaped by interactions with those who implement tax laws: tax officials. Drawing on a survey of small and medium Rwandan businesses, we provide descriptive and causal evidence into taxpayer experiences and the impact of tax officials’ attitudes and behaviours on taxpayers’ perceptions. A vignette experiment proves that interactions shape compliance attitudes. Facilitation-based interactions improve trust and perceptions of professionalism, while enforcement-focused interactions deteriorate tax morale and respect for the tax administration. Moreover, a population-wide survey of Rwandan tax officials explores how taxpayer characteristics influence officials’ attitudes. A conjoint experiment confirms that tax officials favour more knowledgeable businesses and distrust larger, wealthy taxpayers. The analysis highlights taxpayer knowledge and facilitation efforts as key to improving compliance through healthier taxpayer-administration interactions.

Mascagni-The Interpersonal Side Of Tax Compliance-161.pdf


Property Tax Compliance in Tanzania: Can Nudges Help?

Fredrick Manang

University of Dodoma (UDOM), Tanzania

We report the results of a text message campaign to promote tax compliance among landowners in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Landowners were randomly assigned to one of four groups designed to test different aspects of tax morale. They received a simple text message reminder to pay their tax (a test of salience), a message highlighting the connection between taxes and public services (reciprocity), a message communicating that people who did not pay were not contributing to local or national development (social pressure), or no message (control).

Recipients of any message were 18 percent more likely to pay any property tax by the end of the study period. Total payment amounts were highest for recipients of reciprocity messages. The average estimated benefit-cost ratio across treatments is 36:1 due to the low cost of the intervention, with higher cost-effectiveness for reciprocity messages. Significant geographic heterogeneity in treatment effect sizes and estimated cost-effectiveness were observed.

Manang-Property Tax Compliance in Tanzania-212.pdf


What Impacts Do Tax Agents Have on Taxpayers’ Compliance in Uganda? Evidence from Tax Administrative Data

Giovanni Occhiali1, Fredrick Kalyango2

1Institute of Development Studies, United Kingdom; 2Uganda Revenue Authority, Uganda

The compliance effect of tax agents in low-income countries has received little attention in the literature. This study asses their impact through matching analysis of the universe of CIT and VAT returns submitted in Uganda between 2019 and 2023. Tax agents’ impact, proxied by the presence of audit expenses, is confirmed as broadly positive. CIT returns prepared by agents show no difference in declared liabilities in the aggregate, and higher declared CIT liabilities in the case of small and medium taxpayers. Significant but small increases in total VAT declared are mediated by increases in reported input and output VAT. Taxpayers relying on agents’ services are also less likely to nil-file and more likely to file late, while a higher likelihood of audit selection does not lead to significant differences in audit adjustments. These results are robust to different specifications and an alternative definition of agents’ use based on survey data.

Occhiali-What Impacts Do Tax Agents Have on Taxpayers’ Compliance-225.pdf


Treat - Remind - Repeat! A Natural Field Experiment in a Tax Amnesty Context

Gayline Migide Vuluku1, Christian Bauer1, Erich Kirchler2

1Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria; 2University of Vienna, Austria

In a natural field experiment with randomised controlled trials, tax debtors received three emails from the Kenya Revenue Authority regarding a tax amnesty. The subjects were randomly assigned to five groups one of which was not contacted. Results show that sequencing nudges in subsequent reminders is effective for tax amnesty uptake. Relative to no email control group, we find average effect size of 9 percentage points on uptake. In addition, sequencing of social norms and deterrence reminders lead to a 2.5 percentage points higher uptake regardless of the treatment order. Deterrence nudges are effective for individuals while payment outcomes are significantly high for early takers. Those who take up the amnesty in the first two rounds pay 30 percent more than late takers. This study extends literature on letter studies by focusing on the context of a tax amnesty and introducing sequenced nudges in subsequent reminders.

Vuluku-Treat - Remind - Repeat! A Natural Field Experiment-346.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: IIPF 2025
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.154+CC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany