JavaScript is Disabled
Your browser's JavaScript functionality is disabled. It has to be enabled to use this function of ConfTool. Here you can find information on how to enable JavaScript If you have any problems, please contact the organizers at info@iipf.org .
Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.
Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.
Some information on the session logistics :
If not stated otherwise, the discussant is the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.
Presenters should speak for no more than 20 minutes, and discussants should limit their remarks to no more than 5 minutes. The remaining time should be reserved for audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest following these guidelines also in the (less common) 3-paper sessions in a 2-hour slot, to allow participants to move between sessions. Discussants are encouraged to avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start a broader discussion with the audience.
Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://www.usiu.ac.ke/iipf/ .
Venue address : United States International University Africa, USIU Road, Off Thika Road (Exit 7, Kenya), P.O. Box 14634, 00800 Nairobi, Kenya
Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 9th Oct 2025, 01:15:38am EAT
C03: Wealth, Inequality, and Taxation
Time:
Thursday, 21/Aug/2025:
2:00pm - 4:00pm
Session Chair: Tsvetana Spasova , University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland FHNWDiscussant 1: Olle Hammar , Linnaeus UniversityDiscussant 2: Jan Žalman , Charles University, PragueDiscussant 3: Tsvetana Spasova , University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland FHNWDiscussant 4: Johan Sæverud , University of Copenhagen
Location: SS6
Presentations
Taxing the Wealth of the Poor: Evidence from the Danish Old-Age Support Asset Test
Johan Sæverud 1 , Niels Johannesen 1,2 , Emmanuel Saez3
1 University of Copenhagen, Denmark; 2 University of Oxford; 3 University of California, Berkeley
This paper provides evidence that asset testing of social transfers substantially depresses the liquid wealth of the poor. Using administrative data on income and wealth for the full population, we estimate the effects of the asset test for an old-age support program in Denmark. We document that the density distribution of liquid wealth exhibits large but diffuse excess mass below the threshold for the low-income elderly relative to control groups of comparable but ineligible individuals. Analyzing high-frequency bank data on assets, spending and cash withdrawals shows that the excess mass largely reflects permanently lower liquid wealth rather than temporary responses.
The Global Distribution of Human and Nonhuman Wealth
Olle Hammar 1 , Daniel Waldenström2
1 Linnaeus University, Sweden; 2 Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Sweden
In this paper, we introduce novel estimates of wealth inequality, integrating the standard household wealth concept with newly assessed individual human capital. Using microdata and national accounts from numerous countries since 1979, we explore the distribution across age, gender, education, and occupation. Our analysis reveals two key findings: human capital is more evenly distributed than financial capital, and total wealth, the sum of human and financial capital, is significantly more equal than financial wealth alone. This study offers a groundbreaking perspective on global wealth dynamics, emphasizing the critical, yet often overlooked, role of human capital in wealth distribution.
Taxing Extreme Wealth of the Super-Rich
Miroslav Palanský1,2 , Alison Schultz2 , Jan Žalman 1
1 Charles University, Prague; 2 Tax Justice Network
The concentration of wealth among the ultra-rich has renewed debates over using wealth taxes to reduce inequality and finance public investments. Traditional measures based on tax records and surveys understate top wealth due to offshore assets, complex holdings, and underreporting. We address this by combining extrapolations from the Wealth Inequality Database (WID) with real-time Forbes billionaire rankings, thereby recalibrating estimates to better capture ultra-wealth. Using Spain’s progressive wealth tax framework as an empirical benchmark, our analysis indicates that a 1.7–3.5% tax on net wealth above the top 0.5% threshold could generate approximately $2.3 trillion annually—roughly 8% of global central government revenues. We also address concerns about behavioral responses; even under scenarios such as billionaire migration, estimated revenues remain robust at $2.2 trillion (7.7% of revenues). Our findings suggest that wealth taxes offer a promising tool to mitigate inequality and fund critical public priorities.
Global Capital Flows and Inequality: A Dynamic Empirical Analysis Across Economies
Stefan Avdjiev1 , Tsvetana Spasova 2
1 Bank for International Settlements (BIS); 2 University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland FHNW, Switzerland
We conduct a comprehensive empirical investigation of the link between inequality and financial openness. We document that the relationship varies considerably not only over time, but also across the main components of total external liabilities, which have been largely overlooked by the existing literature. In emerging market economies (EMEs), an increase in a country’s external liabilities is associated with an initial rise and a subsequent fall in inequality. This appears to be driven by the fact that the channels through which financial openness increases inequality tend to be active immediately, while the inequality-decreasing channels tend to operate with a lag. The link between financial openness and inequality tends to be substantially weaker in advanced economies than in EMEs.