Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference.

Please select a date to show only sessions at that day. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

Activate "Show Presentations" and enter your name in the search field in order to find your function (s), like presenter, discussant, chair.

Some information on the session logistics:

The discussant is always the following speaker, with the first speaker being the discussant of the last paper. The last speaker of each session is the session chair.

Presenters should use no more than 20 minutes; discussants no more than 5 minutes; the remaining time should be devoted to audience questions and the presenter’s responses. We suggest to follow these guidelines also for (uncommon) sessions with 3 papers in a 2-hour slot, to enable participants to switch sessions. We recommend that discussants avoid summarizing the paper. By focusing their brief remarks on a few questions and comments, the discussants can help start the general discussion with audience members.

Only registered participants can attend this conference. Further information available on the congress website https://iipf2024.vse.cz/ .

Please note that all times are shown in the time zone of the conference. The current conference time is: 30th Apr 2025, 05:02:06am CEST

 
 
Session Overview
Session
D01: Corporate Taxation and Regulation
Time:
Thursday, 22/Aug/2024:
1:30pm - 3:30pm

Location: Room RB 103 (Rajská building)

capacity 24

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

State-of-the-ART profit shifting

Mohammed Mardan1, Dirk Schindler2

1Norwegian School of Economics, Norway; 2Erasmus School of Economics, Netherlands

This study highlights the overarching role of risk shifting via alternative risk transfers (ART) in multinational companies' profit shifting practices. Risk shifting allows multinational companies to transition from ex-ante to ex-post shifting, that is, it reduces the risk of shifting profits away from a loss-making affiliate. Therefore, ART enable the multinationals to be more aggressive in their profit shifting. Our analyses also rationalizes the dominant use of sale-dependent royalty payments to invoice user fees on intangible assets. Such royalties are superior to fixed fees whenever the scope of ART is constrained and risk shifting is incomplete. The reason is that the amount of shifted profits is positively correlated with profitability when sales-dependent royalties are used.

Mardan-State-of-the-ART profit shifting-632.pdf


The Dynamic Effects of Corporate Tax Policy in Oligopolies

Thomas Gresik1, Giorgi Piriashvili2

1University of Notre Dame, United States of America; 2Tbilisi State University, Georgia

We model capital investment in an oligopoly as an infinite-horizon dynamic game and analyze the short-run and long-run economic effects of a country’s corporate tax policy. In an industry with a low rate of capital depreciation (or product turnover), an increase in the tax deductibility of a firm’s capital investments, as reflected in a shift from income taxation to cash flow taxation, decreases market concentration and increases consumer surplus at the cost of large tax subsidies. However, in industries with a high rate of depreciation, the shift increases consumer surplus and tax revenues at the cost of higher market concentration.

Gresik-The Dynamic Effects of Corporate Tax Policy in Oligopolies-333.pdf


CEO Incentives and Tax Avoidance

Robert Dur, Dirk Schindler

Erasmus School of Economics, Netherlands, The

An increasingly important component of corporate social responsibility is corporate tax responsibility, i.e., the extent to which a company pays its fair share of taxes. We develop a model of a company where the shareholders may care about corporate tax responsibility, but the CEO does not. We show that when shareholders care about corporate tax responsibility, they condition the CEO's compensation on both after-tax and before-tax profits. However, and surprisingly, we find that such a compensation contract may also be optimal for purely selfish shareholders. The reason is that, under quite natural conditions, a mix of before- and after-tax profit incentives gives stronger incentives to invest and exert effort than relying on after-tax profits only. Tax avoidance decline when before-tax profits play a more prominent role in the incentive contract, and more generally, the price for the additional managerial effort is a higher tax burden in the firm.

Dur-CEO Incentives and Tax Avoidance-391.pdf


 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Privacy Statement · Conference: IIPF 2024
Conference Software: ConfTool Pro 2.6.153+CC
© 2001–2025 by Dr. H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany