Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | |
|
W02.1: Explanation and the “practical turn" in philosophy of mathematics – an interdisciplinary perspective Location: 23.21 U1.76 Session Chair: Deborah Kant Session Chair: Eva Müller-Hill The practical turn in the philosophy of mathematics shifts the focus from traditional foundational questions to the actual practice of mathematics, opening new avenues for interdisciplinary engagement. One such field is mathematics education, where overlaps emerge particularly in epistemological questions—for example, the nature and role of explanation. This workshop aims to provide a forum for exploring these. | |
| Presentation 4 | |
Mathematics as Explanation and Scientific Understanding – Kantian Foundations, Abduction, and Cognitive Intelligibility University of Pavia, Italy This presentation investigates the pivotal role of mathematics in providing explanation and scientific understanding, grounded in Immanuel Kant’s anti-metaphysical philosophy of mathematics and my own research on abduction, diagrams, and cognitive affordances. Kant’s framework casts mathematics as a transformative tool that organizes empirical phenomena into a coherent system of relations, enabling advanced cognitive processes aimed at making the universe intelligible. I extend this perspective to explore three key aspects: 1) the generalization of Kant’s “Aesthetics” and “Logic” to support a naturalized and historicized view of mathematics, emphasizing the interplay between mathematical concepts and their historical development; 2) the critical role of mathematical modeling as a powerful method for generating explanatory scientific understanding, serving as a counterbalance to the overemphasis on big data; and 3) the importance of mathematically sound cognitive schemata to prevent superficial modeling mischaracterized as scientific. Incorporating my own focus on abductive reasoning and diagrammatic thinking, I argue that mathematics functions as a dynamic explanatory framework that structures scientific knowledge and enhances our capacity to comprehend the world. This analysis offers a fresh perspective on the cognitive and epistemic contributions of mathematics to scientific inquiry and intelligibility. | |

