The 12th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
July 7th to 10th, 2026 | Toulouse, France
Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
SS15 - 2: Advancements in Smart Materials and Structures for SHM in Civil Engineering - 2
| ||
| Session Abstract | ||
|
Organisers:
Advancements in smart materials and structural systems are revolutionizing SHM in civil engineering, enabling intelligent infrastructure with real-time monitoring, damage detection, and predictive maintenance capabilities. This session aims to bring together researchers exploring the cutting-edge developments in smart and multifunctional materials and smart structures, including smart sensors and actuators, self-monitoring structural elements, metamaterials and metastructures with self-diagnosing properties, algorithmic strategies for self-sensory systems (including AI) and the integration of adaptive materials such as piezoelectric systems and self-healing composites in civil engineering structures, just to name the main areas of interest. Emphasis is placed on both experimental and practical applications that enhance the safety, resilience, and sustainability of modern infrastructure. | ||
| Presentations | ||
2:20pm - 2:40pm
Embedded Fiber Optic Sensing for Structural Health Monitoring in Large Format Additive Manufacturing: An Integrated Approach U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, United States of America This research investigates the integration of fiber optic (FO) strain sensors into Large Format Additive Manufacturing (LFAM) components to enable real-time structural health monitoring (SHM) for civil infrastructure. The study addresses four fundamental questions: (1) Can embedded fiber optics reliably identify structural events and usage patterns? (2) Is adequate interfacial bonding achieved between the fiber optic sensor and polymer matrix? (3) How does the embedding process affect strain measurement accuracy? (4) What impact does sensor integration have on the mechanical performance of printed components? Twenty short carbon fiber-reinforced PLA specimens were fabricated in two configurations, neat and fiber-optic-embedded, and subjected to quasi-static tensile testing to failure and displacement-controlled cyclic fatigue testing. The embedding process leveraged LFAM’s layer-by-layer deposition and relatively low processing temperatures to place optical fibers between print layers without modifying standard print parameters. X-ray computed tomography revealed a fiber-to-matrix contact percentage of 58.2%, indicating that interfacial porosity introduced during embedding partially limits strain transfer and that absolute FO strain measurements should be interpreted alongside an independent reference measurement. Under cyclic fatigue loading, embedded FO sensors demonstrated strong qualitative agreement with load-cell-reported stress measurements, faithfully resolving cycle peaks, valleys, and transitions in real time. Quantitative differences between FO-measured strain and crosshead-derived applied strain were attributed to the limitations of crosshead displacement as a proxy for material strain, incomplete fiber-matrix contact, and local material heterogeneity. Across both testing regimes, the influence of FO embedment on bulk mechanical performance was inconsistent, with no systematic reduction in peak force or displacement, although inherent variability in the printed material limited definitive conclusions. These results demonstrate that fiber optic sensors can be embedded into LFAM components without meaningful disruption to fabrication or a consistent mechanical penalty, supporting the broader vision of self-sensing structural components with built-in monitoring capabilities. Further development is needed to improve fiber-matrix contact quality and expand the experimental test matrix for practical deployment in civil infrastructure applications. 2:40pm - 3:00pm
Monitoring of Localized P-Wave Velocity Variations Using Travel-Time Inversion from Fiber Bragg Grating Measurements in a Resin Sample 1Géophysique et Evaluation Non Destructive, Université Gustave Eiffel, GERS-GéoEND, Nantes campus, F-44344 Bouguenais, France; 2Laboratoire d’Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST), Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Université Paris-Saclay, Paris-Saclay Campus, F-91120 Palaiseau, France; 3Agence Nationale Pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs (ANDRA), F-92298 Châtenay-Malabry, France The ability to monitor variations in seismic or acoustic wave velocity is of major interest in many applications like Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), near surface geophysics, the security in an underground context or oil industry. The use of buried sensors is particularly suited to this goal, as it provides information about the internal properties of the probed medium. Fiber Optic Sensors (FOS) offer some advantages in buried contexts, such as their low intrusiveness (due to their small diameter) and their immunity to electromagnetic interferences. In particular, Fiber Bragg Gratings (FBGs) sensors can be used to measure dynamic strain fields caused by mechanical waves. The primary information that can be gathered from these measurements is the travel time of a P-wave between a source and a buried receiver. Here we attempt to measure P-wave travel time variations in order to image a local change in the mechanical properties of the probed medium. A differential inversion approach is used to convert travel time differences into an image of the relative velocity variations. To validate this method, a combination of numerical studies and laboratory experiments is used. To this end, a polyurethane resin mock-up is made, in which FBGs sensors are embedded and used as ultrasonic sensors. Then, the local changes in P-wave velocity between a reference state and two disturbed states of the mock-up is map, based on the inversion of P-wave travel time differences. The results of differential inversions demonstrate that the imaging method developed can be used to monitor a local P-wave velocity contrast using embedded FBGs as ultrasonic sensors. 3:00pm - 3:20pm
Resistivity-Derived Features for Anomaly Detection in Self-Sensing Concrete under Monotonic and Ramp–Hold Loading 1University of Warwick, United Kingdom; 2Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology Self-sensing concrete (SSC) can support structural health monitoring by turning the bulk electrical response of cementitious material into a sensing channel. This paper evaluates simple, training-free resistivity-derived features under monotonic destructive tests (MDT) and ramp--hold--ramp monitoring (NMT-RHR). 3:20pm - 3:40pm
Smart Materials Electrometer V2.0: Evaluating Piezoresistance in carbon fiber bricks at multiple channels Università Degli Studi di Perugia, Via Goffredo Duranti 93, 06125, Perugia, Italy Clay-based composites have been emerging as strain-sensors despite the current challenges in incorporating conductive fibers within them. These fibers must resist firing conditions between 900 °C and 1100 °C, which can typically only be withstood by metallic fibers such as steel fibers. Nevertheless, a recent study has demonstrated that graphitic pyroproteins with conductive characteristics can be incorporated into clay-based composites, also known as smart bricks, exhibiting gauge factors comparable to those of carbon/cement-based composites. To evaluate such piezoresistive properties, loading tests in combination with the biphasic approach (10 V at low frequency, <100 Hz) were implemented using a low-cost acquisition system named the Smart Materials Electrometer (SME). This hardware demonstrated significant accuracy in piezoresistive and piezocapacitive measurements in comparison with high-cost systems in the market. In this occasion, a multichannel version of SME (see Figure 1) demonstrated the strain-sensing capabilities of carbon/clay-based bricks. This new generation of smart bricks was embedded in medium-scale walls as piezoresistive sensors to address damage detection and strain-monitoring, paving the way for future applications in structural health monitoring. | ||

