Conference Agenda
Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).
|
Daily Overview |
| Session | ||
SY40: Crisis Editor Forum: An overview of manuscript preparation, the peer-review process, and publication ethics
| ||
    | ||
Crisis Editor Forum: An overview of manuscript preparation, the peer-review process, and publication ethics 1: Medical University of Vienna, Center for Public Health, Department of Public Mental Health; 2: School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health University College Cork Cork, Ireland; 3: Global & Cultural Mental Health Unit Centre for Mental Health & Community Wellbeing Melbourne School of Population and Global Health Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia; 4: Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA; 5: UCL Division of Psychiatry Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, North London NHS Foundation Trust; 6: Head of Journals Publishing, Hogrefe Publishing GmbH The aim of the session will be to facilitate an educational discussion between editorial leadership of Crisis and attendees of the ESSSB21 who are interested in publishing in Crisis: The Journal Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention. Our aim is for Crisis to be a leading publication in suicidology and crisis intervention and the workshop provides a forum for the editors to engage with the clinicians, counselors, and researchers who are potential authors and readers. The Editors of Crisis will present information on the Journal’s editorial and peer-review processes and share insights about how to prepare a high-quality manuscript for publication in a leading scientific journal. The session will be particularly helpful for early-career researchers and clinicians as they can hear directly from Editors about their expectations for high-quality manuscript submissions and their insights on how best to respond to editor and reviewer comments when authors revise their manuscript. We will include a spotlight on the peer-review process undertaken at the Journal in an effort to provide greater transparency regarding the evaluation of manuscript submissions and how editorial decisions are reached. To do so, we will present a published paper and the editors, will discuss how the paper developed from first submission through author revisions, and ultimately, to acceptance. By elucidating important aspects of peer review we would like to demonstrate how the evaluation process improves papers prior to publication. As publisher of Crisis, Hogrefe Publishing, would like to highlight useful information for authors regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies in the manuscript preparation and peer-review processes, and the various considerations regarding publication ethics authors and reviewers must keep in mind when utilizing these new technologies. The session will both explore how the work of research and clinical teams can contribute to the publication process; and in turn, influence how Crisis continues to develop and publish content that moves the fields of suicidology and crisis intervention forward. | ||