Conference Agenda

Overview and details of the sessions of this conference. Please select a date or location to show only sessions at that day or location. Please select a single session for detailed view (with abstracts and downloads if available).

 
Session Overview
Session
SP08: (Un)Making Solidarities
Time:
Wednesday, 30/Aug/2017:
11:00am - 12:30pm

Session Chair: Marta Soler-Gallart, University of Barcelona
Location: PB.2.5
PANTEION University of Social & Political Sciences 136 Syggrou Avenue 17671 Athens, Greece Building: B, Level: 2.
Semi-Plenary 08 with Ipek Demir and Pekka Juhani Sulkunen.

Show help for 'Increase or decrease the abstract text size'
Presentations

(Un)Making Europe: How to make sense of the contemporary ‘politics of resentment’?

Ipek Demir

University of Leicester, United Kingdom

My paper will discuss the (un)making of Europe in the context of contemporary issues over difference in Europe. It will rethink the relationship between diasporas, cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism in order to make sense of identity, difference, conflict, crisis and resistance in contemporary Europe, including the ‘politics of resentment’ which governs the European social and political sphere.

There is currently a growing opposition to both multiculturalism and to cosmopolitan ideals in Europe. The backlash against multiculturalism is accompanied by an anti-immigration and nationalist sentiment, challenging cosmopolitan values. The ‘threat’ from one is conflated with the other, presented as a menace poised against, and ready to puncture, European identity, culture, civilization and values.

However, rather than seen as bedfellows, cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism have come to be constructed as adversaries. Many social commentators and scholars appeal to cosmopolitanism’s Enlightenment origins, taking Kant’s theories on cosmopolitanism as a basis. Cosmopolitanism is what the desirable Europeans did and aspired to; the ‘undesirable’ ‘parochial’ ethno-religious communities of Europe, on the other hand, did something we did not like very much: they did multiculturalism. What is interesting is that this backlash against multiculturalism did not only come from the usual suspects. Sociologists, for example, Beck (2011: 54), Delanty (2011: 650), and Glick-Schiller et al (2011: 401) have also been critical of multiculturalism, or used multiculturalism as a foil when defending cosmopolitanism (See Demir 2016 for a criticism of this). This juxtaposition of cosmopolitanism against multiculturalism is all the more perplexing given that both cosmopolitanism and multiculturalism question the upper hand that the hegemonic national subjects hold, and attempt to increase the participation of all, including minoritized groups, as equal civic and political citizens within and across nation-states. Debates on Brexit and immigration have tapped into this existing dislike of multiculturalism (and the associated loss of privilege). This is borne out with numbers we have on Brexit which show that multiculturalism tops the list of social ills for Brexiters (81%) over and above immigration (80%) – even if slightly. In my paper I will explore such issues, including the extent to which resistance to both cosmopolitan values and multiculturalism we see in Europe today can be seen as a deep yearning for an old Europe where people knew their place, especially the immigrants, or non-whites or those from the colonies. I will attempt to uncover how without a proper understanding of the backlash against multiculturalism and racial diversity in Europe, we cannot make sense of contemporary Europe, including its making and unmaking.

SHORT BIOGRAPHY:

Ipek Demir (PhD, Sussex) is an Associate Professor in Sociology at the University of Leicester, UK. She was previously an ESRC Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Cambridge. Demir’s work sits at the intersections of the fields of diaspora studies, ethno-politics, race and identity, nationalism, indigeneity, global politics as well as social and critical thought. She has carried out empirical research on Kurdish and Turkish diasporas, funded by the AHRC. Her latest article is entitled: 'Shedding an Ethnic Identity in Diaspora: De-Turkification and the Transnational Discursive Struggles of the Kurdish Diaspora', published in Critical Discourse Studies (Feb 2017). She is the founder and co-coordinator of BSA’s Diaspora, Migration and Transnationalism Study Group and the former Vice-Chair of ESA’s Sociology of Migration Research Network.


Causality or Justice? Contradicting Principles of Regulating Problematic Consumption in Consumer Society

Pekka Juhani Sulkunen

University of Helsinki, Finland

Evidence-based public policy usually requires proof of causality as its justification. The causes of problems must be identified and demonstration of the effectiveness of specific measures is a condition for their application. “What works?” is a standard requirement for regulation of problematic lifestyles or consumption. The requirement of causality is often in a strange contradiction with justice. In many lifestyle issues such as excessive eating, gambling, drinking or other behavioural problems causality usually cannot be demonstrated. We do not know, for example, whether poverty is a cause or a consequence of gambling, overconsumption of food, drink or other deleterious consumption patterns. Neglect of policy in these cases means violation of our intuitive concept of justice. This paper applies Adam Smith’s theory of justice to deal with the problem. In his Theory of Moral Sentiments he advances the idea that justice is the fundamental moral sentiment for the maintenance of social order and solidarity. It is based on the passion of anger but must be qualified and regulated by reason. The paper argues that justice rather than causality should take priority in social policies that aim at social cohesion and order.

SHORT BIOGRAPHY:

Pekka Sulkunen is professor emeritus of sociology, University of Helsinki. He was President of the European Sociological Association 2011-2013. He is a member of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters. His research interests are the public sector governance, power and democracy, social theory, and addictions. Recent publications include: The Saturated Society (Second Edition 2016); Society on its own. The sociological promise today (European J. of Cultural and Political Sociology 2014); Autonomy against Intimacy (Telos 156/2011); The Kurdish Question: The Black Holes of Democracy (Telos 171/2015). The Consumer Society and the Social Bond: the Neoliberal Turn in Norway (2015); The Images Theory of Addiction (2015). Currently lecturing on “The sociological promise from the Enlightenment to Postmodern Critics”. Principal author of an international collaborative book Gambling, Science and Public Policy (Oxford University Press, forthcoming 2018).



 
Contact and Legal Notice · Contact Address:
Conference: ESA 2017
Conference Software - ConfTool Pro 2.6.111+TC
© 2001 - 2017 by H. Weinreich, Hamburg, Germany