The study examined the intergenerational transmission of aggressive conflict resolution towards intimate partners from Generation 1 (G1) parents to both Generation 2 (G2) parents and partners (G2 partner), and the potential spillover effects from G2 and G2 partner’s aggressive conflict resolution to G2’s harsh and inconsistent parental discipline towards Generation 3 (G3) children. Using data from the Research on Adolescent Development and Relationships (RADAR) project, G1, G2 (51.5% female; M_age = 14.82 in mid-adolescence, M_age = 29.66 in parenthood), and later G2’s partner and G3 were followed from G2’s adolescence to adulthood. The sample comprised 1,178 G1-G2 dyads, including 222 G1-G2-G3 triads. Path analyses provided evidence for (1) intergenerational transmission, i.e., G1’s aggressive conflict resolution in G2’s mid-adolescence weakly predicted G2’s aggressive conflict resolution in G2’s adulthood; (2) spillover effects, i.e., G2’s aggressive conflict resolution predicted G2’s harsh and inconsistent discipline towards G3 children. Most of the intergenerational transmission and spillover relations did not differ across G1 and G2 gender. Overall, the findings highlight the intergenerational transmission of aggressive conflict resolution towards intimate partners and its subsequent relation with harsh and inconsistent discipline. Future prevention could target both parental figures in G1 and G2 to disrupt the cycle of aggressive conflict resolution and prevent problematic discipline practices.

Across Europe and North America, most youth spend their time outside of family and school in organized activities, such as sports. In these cultures, organized sports are highly valued on a macro level and are also encouraged at micro levels (e.g., within families, schools, and peer groups). These trends are promising, as research consistently highlights the significant potential of organized activities, like sports, for positive youth development. However, a growing body of research reveals that sexual harassment (SH—in this study defined as unwanted sexual attention, including sexual comments, inappropriate name-calling, obscene gestures, and touching) is common among youth in organized sports settings. SH has become so prevalent that it is now a normalized aspect of the sports environment. This presents a major issue, as SH victimization can lead to numerous negative consequences for youth, such as depressive symptoms, social anxiety, and suicidal ideation. While existing research illuminates the presence, prevalence, and outcomes of SH among youth, a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon is still lacking. Therefore, in this study, we employed a qualitative approach that captures youth athletes’ subjective perceptions and experiences of SH in the sports context. We conducted interviews with seventeen active athletes aged 15 to 18. Our findings provide an in-depth understanding of SH in youth sports settings. Specifically, the findings illustrate how youth perceive SH in sports situations and how these experiences may influence their feelings and behaviors within these contexts. Furthermore, the interview findings also reveal when (e.g., during practices or games), by whom (e.g., teammates or opponents), and why SH may occur among youth in organized sports. The results of this study have significant implications for future research and the work of practitioners.

Sexual Harassment (SH) is prevalent in universities across the EU. However, there is limited evidence on its impact on mental health and well-being, and even less on the role of resilience in coping with such experiences. In Greece, research on this issue is scarce, with only one study having explored the phenomenon. Hence, the present study aimed to a) document the extent of SH in Greek universities and b) explore the association between SH and anxiety symptoms and whether resilience remains a protective factor after controlling for SH.

The study included students (N = 498) from Greek universities (348 females, mean age = 25.3) who provided demographic information and reported their experiences of SH. Self-report psychometric tools were employed to assess anxiety symptoms (GAD-7), and factors associated with personal and community resilience (ARM-R).

A little less than half of the students (46.6%) reported being exposed to SH, with 74.5% of them being female and 25.5% male. Hierarchical regression models indicated that sex and age significantly predicted anxiety (F (2, 495) = 14.828, p < 0.001), explaining 6% of the variance. The addition of exposure to SH further improved the model in predicting anxiety, raising the explained variance to 6.6% (R² change = 0.010, F (1, 494) = 5.212, p = 0.023). Resilience contributed beyond sex, age, and exposure to SH (R² change = 0.096, F (1, 493) = 56.440, p < 0.001), significantly increasing the total variance explained to 16%. Results highlight that exposure to SH is associated with increased anxiety; however, resilience serves as a protective factor, mitigating its impact.

Fostering supportive university environments and facilitating access to mental health resources, including resilience-building programmes, are essential first steps in effectively coping with exposure to SH in universities. Yet the ultimate goal of this research field remains its complete elimination.

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Georgia through the lens of ecological systems theory, highlighting the pervasive nature of gender-based violence within the country and its implications on women's health, rights, and societal participation. The study draws on recent national research, revealing that half of Georgian women have experienced violence, with a significant portion facing sexual harassment and IPV. It underscores IPV as a manifestation of deeply entrenched gender inequalities and societal norms that condone male dominance and female subordination. The analysis extends beyond the prevalence of IPV to explore its root causes, impacts, and potential interventions, employing Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory to understand the complex interplay of individual, relational, community, and societal factors contributing to IPV. This framework elucidates the multifaceted influences on human development and behavior, emphasizing the importance of a multi-level approach to preventing and addressing IPV. By adapting Bronfenbrenner’s model to incorporate aspects of interpersonal, structural, and symbolic violence, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how violence permeates the lives of individuals across different contexts and systems. The research highlights the urgent need for informed policies, stronger legal protections, and a cultural shift towards gender equality in Georgia, contributing to the global discourse on IPV and setting a foundation for future studies and interventions aimed at eradicating gender-based violence.

This study examines the rising rates of femicide in Georgia, focusing on the challenges women face when ending a relationship. Cultural and social norms often enable men to pose greater threats to women post-separation, exacerbating their vulnerability. The research explores the lack of support mechanisms and legal protections available to assist women during and after separation.

Using a qualitative approach, the study analyzes in-depth interviews with survivors of intimate partner violence and legal professionals. Findings reveal a severe shortage of protective measures, including legal aid, counseling, and financial assistance, leaving women at heightened risk. Entrenched gender inequalities and social structures that prioritize male dominance further contribute to this crisis.

The absence of specialized services amplifies women’s struggles to leave abusive relationships safely. This research underscores the urgent need for comprehensive support systems, including tailored legal frameworks, well-funded services, and accessible protective measures. Addressing these gaps is critical for policymakers, activists, and service providers working to reduce femicide rates and safeguard women’s lives in Georgia.